Suppr超能文献

随机高血压患者中奥美沙坦、氨氯地平和氢氯噻嗪联合治疗:TRINITY 研究按年龄的亚组分析。

Combined olmesartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide therapy in randomized patients with hypertension: a subgroup analysis of the TRINITY study by age.

机构信息

National Research Institute, 2010 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. 302, Los Angeles, CA 90057, USA.

出版信息

Drugs Aging. 2013 Jul;30(7):549-60. doi: 10.1007/s40266-013-0072-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is often inadequately controlled in older people.

OBJECTIVE

This prespecified subgroup analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of an olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg/amlodipine besylate (AML) 10 mg/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg triple-combination treatment compared with the 3 components as dual-combination treatments in participants with hypertension who were <65 and ≥ 65 years of age. Within the ≥ 65 years of age subgroup, efficacy and safety were also summarized for participants ≥ 75 years of age.

STUDY DESIGN

12-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study.

SETTING

317 ambulatory care sites in the US and Puerto Rico.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals ≥ 18 years of age with mean seated blood pressure (SeBP) ≥ 140/100 or ≥ 160/90 mmHg off antihypertensive medication on 2 consecutive clinic visits with no recent history of significant cerebrovascular disease, coronary artery disease, heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV), severe renal insufficiency, or uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c >9 %).

INTERVENTION

Participants were randomized, stratified by age, diabetes status, and race to one of four treatment assignments: OM 40/AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg, OM 40/AML 10 mg, OM 40/HCTZ 25 mg, or AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Least squares (LS) mean change from baseline in seated diastolic blood pressure (SeDBP) at week 12 (last observation carried forward) in each age subgroup (prespecified analysis).

RESULTS

Of the 2492 randomized participants in the study (total cohort), 2021 (81.1 %) were <65 and 471 (18.9 %) were ≥ 65 years of age, including 79 (3.2 %) who were ≥ 75 years of age. OM 40/AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg triple-combination treatment resulted in a significantly greater reduction in LS mean SeDBP at week 12 than dual-combination component treatments in participants in both cohorts: <65 years (21.0 vs. 14.2-17.2 mmHg; p < 0.0001) and ≥ 65 years (23.7 vs. 17.3-20.0 mmHg; p ≤ 0.002). Similarly, triple-combination treatment resulted in a greater reduction in LS mean seated systolic blood pressure (SeSBP) at week 12 than dual-combination component treatments: <65 years (38.2 vs. 28.3-31.4 mmHg; p < 0.0001) and ≥ 65 years (39.2 vs. 29.3-31.1 mmHg; p < 0.0001). Triple-combination treatment was more effective than dual-combination treatments in enabling participants to reach SeBP goal (<140/90 mmHg [<130/80 mmHg in participants with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or chronic cardiovascular disease]) in both age subgroups (<65 years: 65 vs. 34-50 %, respectively, p < 0.0001 and ≥ 65 years: 63 vs. 32-39 %; p ≤ 0.0004). All 4 treatments were safe and well tolerated with low discontinuation rates in both age subgroups. There were no clinically relevant differences in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events between participants <65 and ≥ 65 years of age receiving triple-combination treatment.

CONCLUSION

Triple-combination treatment with OM 40/AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg was well tolerated and more effective in lowering BP than the component dual-combination treatments in elderly and non-elderly subgroups.

摘要

背景

高血压在老年人中常常控制不佳。

目的

本预设亚组分析评估了奥美沙坦酯(OM)40mg/氨氯地平(AML)10mg/氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)25mg 三联组合治疗与两种成分的双联组合治疗在年龄<65 岁和≥65 岁的高血压患者中的疗效和安全性。在≥65 岁年龄亚组中,还总结了≥75 岁患者的疗效和安全性。

研究设计

为期 12 周、多中心、双盲、随机、平行组研究。

设置

美国和波多黎各的 317 个门诊护理场所。

参与者

年龄≥18 岁,平均坐位血压(SeBP)≥140/100mmHg 或未服用降压药物的连续两次就诊时≥160/90mmHg,无近期重大脑血管疾病、冠状动脉疾病、心力衰竭(纽约心脏协会 III 或 IV 级)、严重肾功能不全或未控制的糖尿病(HbA1c>9%)病史。

干预措施

参与者随机分组,按年龄、糖尿病状态和种族分层,分为四种治疗分配:OM 40/AML 10/HCTZ 25mg、OM 40/AML 10mg、OM 40/HCTZ 25mg 或 AML 10/HCTZ 25mg。

主要观察指标

每个年龄亚组(预设分析)在第 12 周(最后一次观察结转)时从基线开始的坐位舒张压(SeDBP)的最小二乘(LS)平均值变化。

结果

在研究中的 2492 名随机参与者(总队列)中,2021 名(81.1%)<65 岁,471 名(18.9%)≥65 岁,包括 79 名(3.2%)≥75 岁。与两种成分的双联组合治疗相比,OM 40/AML 10/HCTZ 25mg 三联组合治疗在两个队列的参与者中,第 12 周时坐位舒张压(SeDBP)LS 均值的降低更为显著:<65 岁(21.0mmHg 比 14.2-17.2mmHg;p<0.0001)和≥65 岁(23.7mmHg 比 17.3-20.0mmHg;p≤0.002)。同样,三联组合治疗使 LS 均值坐位收缩压(SeSBP)在第 12 周的降低也大于双联组合成分治疗:<65 岁(38.2mmHg 比 28.3-31.4mmHg;p<0.0001)和≥65 岁(39.2mmHg 比 29.3-31.1mmHg;p<0.0001)。与双联组合治疗相比,三联组合治疗在使参与者达到坐位血压目标(<140/90mmHg [<130/80mmHg 适用于患有糖尿病、慢性肾病或慢性心血管疾病的患者])方面更有效,<65 岁年龄组中,分别有 65%、34%-50%、≥65 岁年龄组中,分别有 63%、32%-39%(p<0.0001 和 p≤0.0004)。所有 4 种治疗方案均安全且耐受良好,两个年龄亚组的停药率均较低。接受三联组合治疗的<65 岁和≥65 岁年龄组患者的治疗中出现的不良事件发生率无临床相关差异。

结论

与双联组合治疗相比,奥美沙坦酯(OM)40mg/氨氯地平(AML)10mg/氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)25mg 三联组合治疗在降低血压方面耐受性良好,疗效更优,在老年和非老年亚组中均如此。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/508c/3687106/3dffc03a5ecd/40266_2013_72_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验