• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时,常规早期与延迟临时替罗非班治疗的比较。

Routine early versus deferred provisional tirofiban treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

作者信息

Zhang You, Gao Chuanyu, Liu Hongzhi, Wang Xianpei, Yang Honghui, Li Muwei, Wang Xianqing, Zhu Zhongyu, Hu Dayi

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.

出版信息

Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2013 Apr;40(4):289-94. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.12065.

DOI:10.1111/1440-1681.12065
PMID:23551127
Abstract

The present study examined the optimal timing of tirofiban administration in moderate- or high-risk non-ST segment elevated acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Eligible patients were randomized into two groups. Tirofiban was administered routinely at ≥ 4 h before angiography (routine early group; n = 141 patients) or provisionally only for bailout after angiography (deferred provisional group; n = 145 patients). The parameters analysed were: creatine kinase MB isoenzyme (CK-MB), thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow, thrombotic complications during PCI, efficacy end-points (death, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization) at 7, 30 and 180 days and safety end-points (bleeding or thrombocytopenia). In the deferred provisional group, 48 patients (33.1%) required bailout tirofiban. Tirofiban was administered 5.8 h earlier in the routine early compared with the deferred provisional group. The routine early group showed a lower percentage increase in CK-MB (in U/L) 12-24 h after PCI compared with the deferred provisional group (0 (-4.0, 3.0) vs 0.4 (-3.0, 5.0), respectively; P = 0.045), as well as higher pre-PCI TIMI 3 (i.e. normal) flow (78.7% vs 64.8%, respectively; P = 0.042) and a lower incidence of thrombotic events (5.0% vs 33.1%, respectively; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in efficacy and safety end-points. In patients with moderate- or high-risk NSTE-ACS, early tirofiban combined with dual antiplatelet therapy was associated with better patency before PCI, attenuated minor myocardial damage and a lower prevalence of thrombotic complications during PCI, but had no significant benefit on the post-PCI TIMI 3 flow or short-term prognosis.

摘要

本研究探讨了替罗非班在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的中高危非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者中的最佳给药时机。符合条件的患者被随机分为两组。替罗非班在血管造影前≥4小时常规给药(常规早期组;n = 141例患者),或仅在血管造影后用于补救(延迟临时组;n = 145例患者)。分析的参数包括:肌酸激酶MB同工酶(CK-MB)、心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)血流、PCI期间的血栓并发症、7天、30天和180天的疗效终点(死亡、心肌梗死或靶血管血运重建)以及安全终点(出血或血小板减少)。在延迟临时组中,48例患者(33.1%)需要补救性使用替罗非班。与延迟临时组相比,常规早期组替罗非班给药时间提前5.8小时。与延迟临时组相比,常规早期组在PCI后12 - 24小时CK-MB(单位:U/L)的升高百分比更低(分别为0(-4.0,3.0)与0.4(-3.0,5.0);P = 0.045),PCI前TIMI 3级(即正常)血流更高(分别为78.7%与64.8%;P = 0.042),血栓事件发生率更低(分别为5.0%与33.1%;P < 0.0001)。疗效和安全终点方面无显著差异。在中高危NSTE-ACS患者中,早期使用替罗非班联合双联抗血小板治疗与PCI前更好的血管通畅、减轻轻微心肌损伤以及PCI期间血栓并发症发生率较低相关,但对PCI后TIMI 3级血流或短期预后无显著益处。

相似文献

1
Routine early versus deferred provisional tirofiban treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时,常规早期与延迟临时替罗非班治疗的比较。
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2013 Apr;40(4):289-94. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.12065.
2
Effects of upstream tirofiban versus downstream tirofiban on myocardial damage and 180-day clinical outcomes in high-risk acute coronary syndromes patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.替罗非班上游治疗与下游治疗对高危急性冠状动脉综合征患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后心肌损伤及 180 天临床结局的影响。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Aug 5;122(15):1732-7.
3
[Short- or long-outcome of early tirofiban in ST-segment elevated acute myocardial infarction undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention].[替罗非班早期应用于接受择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死的短期或长期预后]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Apr;53(4):273-7.
4
Efficacy and safety of standard-dose versus half-dose tirofiban in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention.标准剂量与半剂量替罗非班在接受早期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的疗效和安全性。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2013 Aug;31(4):210-4. doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12004.
5
High-dose bolus tirofiban versus low-dose bolus in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时大剂量推注替罗非班与小剂量推注的比较。
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2017 Mar;45(2):126-133. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2016.92186.
6
Efficacy and Safety of Intracoronary versus Intravenous Administration of Tirofiban during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.急性冠状动脉综合征经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间冠状动脉内注射与静脉注射替罗非班的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 11;10(6):e0129718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129718. eCollection 2015.
7
Clinical benefits of adjunctive tirofiban therapy in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.替罗非班辅助治疗对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床益处。
Coron Artery Dis. 2008 Jun;19(4):271-7. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3282f487e0.
8
Changes in BNP, hs-CRP and TIMI risk index with addition of tirofiban during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute STEMI: a prospective observational cohort study.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间加用替罗非班时脑钠肽、超敏C反应蛋白及心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)风险指数的变化:一项前瞻性观察性队列研究
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2012 Mar;12(2):107-14. doi: 10.5152/akd.2012.035. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
9
[Efficacy and safety of tirofiban use after successful percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with moderate to high risk non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes].替罗非班用于中高危非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗成功后的疗效及安全性
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2013 Sep;41(9):731-5.
10
Short-term effect of upstream administration in comparison to deferred injection of tirofiban on patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时,与延迟替罗非班注射相比,上游给药的短期疗效。
J Interv Cardiol. 2013 Aug;26(4):332-9. doi: 10.1111/joic.12044. Epub 2013 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of different routes of tirofiban injection on the left ventricular function and prognosis of patients with myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.替罗非班不同注射途径对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心肌梗死患者左心室功能及预后的影响
Exp Ther Med. 2015 Jun;9(6):2401-2405. doi: 10.3892/etm.2015.2401. Epub 2015 Apr 1.