• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

足部健康评估工具的开发过程和心理计量学测试。

Development process and psychometric testing of foot health assessment instrument.

机构信息

Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2013 May;22(9-10):1310-21. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12078. Epub 2013 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1111/jocn.12078
PMID:23551237
Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To describe the development process of the foot health assessment instrument for the assessment of foot health in older people and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the foot health assessment instrument.

BACKGROUND

In clinical nursing, assessment of foot health and recognition of foot problems in older people is fundamental for maintain older persons' independent functional ability. However, valid and reliable nurse-administered foot health assessment instruments are lacking.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional methodological design.

METHODS

The foot health assessment instrument was developed in 2008-2011 based on a literature review and expertise in podiatry and nursing. Content validity was evaluated in four expert panels. Inter-rater reliability between nurses' and researcher (MS) assessments was evaluated in the pilot test and in the empirical testing of the instrument with a sample of visiting home nurses. Inter-rater reliability was calculated with Cohen's kappa, internal consistency reliability was examined with Cronbach's alpha coefficients and item analysis, and construct validity was evaluated by principal component analysis with Varimax rotation and confirmatory factor analysis.

RESULTS

Content validity was guaranteed by the expert analyses. Inter-rater reliability improved after pilot test. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the total foot health assessment instrument was satisfactory. Item-to-total correlations varied between but most of them were acceptable. Principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis supported the four component structure of the foot health assessment instrument.

CONCLUSIONS

The 23-item foot health assessment instrument showed preliminary acceptable psychometric properties. However, further modifications and testing are needed to strengthen the psychometric properties of the foot health assessment instrument.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The existence of a foot health assessment instrument and its application would considerably improve the assessment of foot health in daily nursing practice. The foot health assessment instrument developed in this study is short and easy to administer.

摘要

目的

描述足部健康评估工具的开发过程,用于评估老年人的足部健康,并评估足部健康评估工具的心理测量学特性。

背景

在临床护理中,评估老年人的足部健康和识别足部问题是维持老年人独立功能能力的基础。然而,缺乏有效的、可靠的护士管理的足部健康评估工具。

设计

一项横断面方法设计。

方法

足部健康评估工具于 2008-2011 年根据文献回顾和足病学和护理专业知识开发而成。内容效度在四个专家小组中进行了评估。在试点测试和对访视家庭护士样本的工具实证测试中,评估了护士和研究员(MS)评估之间的评分者间可靠性。使用 Cohen's kappa 计算评分者间可靠性,使用 Cronbach's alpha 系数和项目分析检查内部一致性可靠性,使用主成分分析和最大方差旋转进行结构有效性评估,并使用验证性因子分析进行验证。

结果

专家分析保证了内容效度。试点测试后,评分者间可靠性提高。足部健康评估工具的总 Cronbach's alpha 系数令人满意。项目与总分的相关性存在差异,但大多数都可以接受。主成分分析和验证性因子分析支持足部健康评估工具的四个组成部分结构。

结论

23 项足部健康评估工具表现出初步可接受的心理测量学特性。然而,需要进一步修改和测试,以加强足部健康评估工具的心理测量学特性。

临床意义

足部健康评估工具的存在及其应用将极大地改善日常护理实践中足部健康的评估。本研究开发的足部健康评估工具简短易用。

相似文献

1
Development process and psychometric testing of foot health assessment instrument.足部健康评估工具的开发过程和心理计量学测试。
J Clin Nurs. 2013 May;22(9-10):1310-21. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12078. Epub 2013 Mar 29.
2
Development and testing of an instrument to assess nurses' knowledge, risk perception, health beliefs and behaviours related to influenza vaccination.评估护士与流感疫苗接种相关的知识、风险感知、健康信念和行为的工具的开发和测试。
J Clin Nurs. 2012 Sep;21(17-18):2636-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03794.x. Epub 2012 May 25.
3
Individualized care scale - nurse version: a Finnish validation study.个体化护理量表-护士版:芬兰验证研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Feb;16(1):145-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01168.x. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
4
Validation of the Chinese version of the satisfaction with the nursing home instrument.中文版养老院护理满意度量表的效度验证。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Dec;15(12):1574-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01507.x.
5
Development of an instrument measuring Chinese adolescent beliefs and attitudes towards substance abuse.一种测量中国青少年对药物滥用的信念和态度的工具的开发。
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Sep;14(8):986-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01202.x.
6
The validity and reliability of an instrument to assess nursing competencies in spiritual care.一种用于评估精神护理中护理能力的工具的有效性和可靠性。
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Oct;18(20):2857-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02594.x. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
7
Nurses' assessments and patients' perceptions: development of the Night Nursing Care Instrument (NNCI), measuring nursing care at night.护士的评估与患者的认知:夜间护理护理工具(NNCI)的开发,用于衡量夜间护理。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2005 Jul;42(5):569-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.09.004.
8
Knowledge levels of Korean intensive care nurses towards brain death and organ transplantation.韩国重症监护护士对脑死亡和器官移植的知识水平。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 May;15(5):574-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01348.x.
9
Reliability and validity of Turkish version of attitudes toward old people scale.老年人态度量表土耳其文版的信度和效度。
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Nov;20(21-22):3196-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03764.x. Epub 2011 Apr 25.
10
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.慢性精神疾病患者康复评估量表(RAS)的日语版的信度和效度:量表编制。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):314-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Baropodometric Assessment of the Podiatric Profile of Nursing Students in Clinical Settings: A Study Protocol.临床环境中护理学生足部形态的足压计评估:研究方案。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 12;10:862048. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.862048. eCollection 2022.
2
A Rasch analysis of the self-administered Foot Health Assessment Instrument (S-FHAI).自我管理足部健康评估工具(S-FHAI)的拉施分析。
BMC Nurs. 2021 Jun 15;20(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00625-z.
3
Evaluation of the development process and effects of a foot care program with educational tools for nurses and care workers as in-home service providers.
评估一项足部护理计划的开展过程及效果,该计划为作为上门服务提供者的护士和护理人员配备了教育工具。
BMC Res Notes. 2020 Sep 5;13(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05263-3.
4
Development and testing of a new electronic foot health promotion programme on nurses' foot self-care.一项关于护士足部自我护理的新型电子足部健康促进计划的开发与测试
BMC Nurs. 2020 Apr 19;19:29. doi: 10.1186/s12912-020-00423-z. eCollection 2020.
5
Effect of foot care interventions for older adults using day care services.足部护理干预措施对使用日间护理服务的老年人的影响。
Nurs Open. 2019 Jul 23;6(4):1372-1380. doi: 10.1002/nop2.333. eCollection 2019 Oct.