Suppr超能文献

布地奈德/福莫特罗(都保®)与福莫特罗(都保®)治疗中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疗效比较:III 期多国研究结果。

Budesonide/formoterol via Turbuhaler® versus formoterol via Turbuhaler® in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: phase III multinational study results.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Respirology. 2013 Jul;18(5):866-73. doi: 10.1111/resp.12090.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The efficacy and tolerability of budesonide/formoterol versus formoterol in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was evaluated.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, phase III study (NCT01069289), patients with moderate to severe COPD for ≥2 years received either budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 μg two inhalations twice daily via Turbuhaler® or formoterol 4.5 μg two inhalations twice daily via Turbuhaler® for 12 weeks. Salbutamol was available as reliever medication. Primary outcome variable: change from baseline to average during treatment in pre-dose forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ).

RESULTS

One thousand two hundred ninety-three patients were randomized (budesonide/formoterol n = 636; formoterol n = 657). Both budesonide/formoterol and formoterol increased pre-dose FEV1 versus baseline (improvements of 4.6% and 1.5% over baseline, respectively), with the increase from baseline being significantly greater with budesonide/formoterol versus formoterol (budesonide/formoterol:formoterol ratio 1.032; 95% confidence interval: 1.013-1.052; P = 0.0011). The budesonide/formoterol group had a significantly prolonged time to first exacerbation versus the formoterol group (hazard ratio: 0.679; 95% confidence interval: 0.507-0.909; P = 0.0094) and significantly greater improvements in many secondary outcome measures. Both treatments were well tolerated; the incidence and type of adverse events were similar: most commonly reported (budesonide/formoterol vs formoterol): COPD (8.0% vs 9.4%) and nasopharyngitis (5.5% vs 4.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 μg two inhalations twice daily was effective and well tolerated in patients with moderate to severe COPD, offering benefits over formoterol alone in terms of improved lung function and reduced risk of exacerbation.

摘要

背景与目的

评估布地奈德/福莫特罗与福莫特罗在中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中的疗效和耐受性。

方法

在这项随机、双盲、平行分组、III 期研究(NCT01069289)中,中重度 COPD 患者≥2 年,每日两次通过 Turbuhaler®吸入布地奈德/福莫特罗 160/4.5μg 或福莫特罗 4.5μg,共 12 周。沙丁胺醇可作为缓解药物。主要观察变量:治疗期间预剂量用力呼气量(FEV1)与基线相比的平均变化。

结果

共 1293 例患者被随机分组(布地奈德/福莫特罗组 n=636;福莫特罗组 n=657)。与基线相比,布地奈德/福莫特罗和福莫特罗均增加了预剂量 FEV1(分别增加 4.6%和 1.5%),布地奈德/福莫特罗与福莫特罗相比,FEV1 自基线的增加显著更大(布地奈德/福莫特罗:福莫特罗比值 1.032;95%置信区间:1.013-1.052;P=0.0011)。与福莫特罗组相比,布地奈德/福莫特罗组首次加重的时间显著延长(风险比:0.679;95%置信区间:0.507-0.909;P=0.0094),许多次要终点的改善也显著更大。两种治疗方法均耐受良好;不良事件的发生率和类型相似:最常见报告的(布地奈德/福莫特罗与福莫特罗相比):COPD(8.0%与 9.4%)和鼻咽炎(5.5%与 4.9%)。

结论

布地奈德/福莫特罗 160/4.5μg 每日两次吸入在中重度 COPD 患者中有效且耐受良好,与单用福莫特罗相比,在改善肺功能和降低加重风险方面具有优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验