Suppr超能文献

布地奈德/福莫特罗单吸入器疗法与高剂量布地奈德治疗中重度哮喘的疗效和安全性比较

Efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol single inhaler therapy versus a higher dose of budesonide in moderate to severe asthma.

作者信息

Scicchitano R, Aalbers R, Ukena D, Manjra A, Fouquert L, Centanni S, Boulet L-P, Naya I P, Hultquist C

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Sep;20(9):1403-18. doi: 10.1185/030079904X2051.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel asthma management strategy--budesonide/formoterol for both maintenance and symptom relief (Symbicort Single Inhaler Therapy)--compared with a higher maintenance dose of budesonide in patients with moderate to severe asthma.

METHODS

This was a 12-month, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study. Symptomatic patients with asthma (n = 1890; mean age 43 years [range 11 years-80 years], mean baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV(1)] 70% of predicted, mean inhaled corticosteroid [ICS] dose 746 microg/day) received either budesonide (160 microg, 2 inhalations twice daily) plus terbutaline 0.4 mg as needed or a daily maintenance dose of budesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 microg, 2 inhalations once daily) with additional inhalations of budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 microg as needed. Time to first severe exacerbation (hospitalisation/emergency room [ER] treatment or systemic steroids due to asthma worsening or a fall in morning peak expiratory flow [PEF] to < or = 70% of baseline on 2 consecutive days) was the primary outcome variable.

RESULTS

A total of 1890 patients were randomised, of whom 1563 (83%) had severe asthma. The time to first severe exacerbation was prolonged by budesonide/formoterol single inhaler therapy (p < 0.001) compared with a higher dose of budesonide. The risk of having a severe exacerbation was 39% lower with budesonide/formoterol single inhaler therapy compared with budesonide (p < 0.001). The number needed to treat to prevent one severe exacerbation per year with budesonide/formoterol compared with budesonide was 5. The budesonide/formoterol group had 45% fewer severe exacerbations requiring medical intervention per patient compared with the budesonide group (p < 0.001). Budesonide/formoterol patients had fewer hospitalisations/ER treatments (15 vs 25 events, respectively [descriptive statistics]) and fewer treatment days with systemic steroids (1776 days vs 3177 days, respectively [descriptive statistics]) compared with budesonide patients. Budesonide/formoterol single inhaler therapy patients used less as-needed medication compared with budesonide patients (0.90 vs 1.42 inhalations/day; p < 0.001). The mean daily ICS dose was lower in the budesonide/formoterol group than in the budesonide group (466 microg/day vs 640 microg/day). Over the 12-month study period, the budesonide/formoterol group achieved asthma control sufficient to not require any additional as-needed medication on 60% of days. Overall, budesonide/formoterol single inhaler therapy gave 31 more asthma control days (a night and day with no asthma symptoms and no as-needed medication use) per patient-year and 12 additional undisturbed nights per patient-year compared with a higher dose of budesonide. Both treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Budesonide/formoterol single inhaler therapy has the potential to provide a complete asthma management approach with one inhaler, demonstrating a high level of efficacy in patients with moderate to severe asthma.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了一种新型哮喘管理策略——布地奈德/福莫特罗用于维持治疗和缓解症状(信必可都保单一吸入器疗法)——与更高维持剂量布地奈德相比,在中重度哮喘患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

这是一项为期12个月的随机、双盲、平行组研究。有症状的哮喘患者(n = 1890;平均年龄43岁[范围11岁 - 80岁],平均基线第1秒用力呼气量[FEV(1)]为预测值的70%,平均吸入性糖皮质激素[ICS]剂量746微克/天)接受布地奈德(160微克,每日两次,每次2吸)加按需使用的0.4毫克特布他林,或布地奈德/福莫特罗每日维持剂量(160/4.5微克,每日1次,每次2吸)并按需额外吸入布地奈德/福莫特罗160/4.5微克。首次严重加重的时间(因哮喘恶化住院/急诊室[ER]治疗或使用全身性激素,或早晨呼气峰流速[PEF]连续2天降至基线的≤70%)是主要结局变量。

结果

共有1890例患者被随机分组,其中1563例(83%)患有重度哮喘。与更高剂量的布地奈德相比,布地奈德/福莫特罗单一吸入器疗法延长了首次严重加重的时间(p < 0.001)。与布地奈德相比,布地奈德/福莫特罗单一吸入器疗法发生严重加重的风险降低了39%(p < 0.001)。与布地奈德相比,使用布地奈德/福莫特罗预防每年1次严重加重所需治疗的患者数为5。与布地奈德组相比,布地奈德/福莫特罗组每位患者需要医疗干预的严重加重次数少45%(p < 0.001)。与布地奈德患者相比,布地奈德/福莫特罗患者的住院/急诊室治疗次数更少(分别为15次和25次[描述性统计]),使用全身性激素的治疗天数更少(分别为1776天和3177天[描述性统计])。与布地奈德患者相比,布地奈德/福莫特罗单一吸入器疗法患者按需使用的药物更少(0.90次/天对1.42次/天;p < 0.001)。布地奈德/福莫特罗组的平均每日ICS剂量低于布地奈德组(466微克/天对640微克/天)。在12个月的研究期间,布地奈德/福莫特罗组在60%的天数里实现了足以无需任何额外按需用药的哮喘控制。总体而言,与更高剂量的布地奈德相比,布地奈德/福莫特罗单一吸入器疗法每位患者每年多获得31个哮喘控制日(无哮喘症状且无需按需用药的白天和夜晚)和12个额外的无干扰夜晚。两种治疗耐受性均良好。

结论

布地奈德/福莫特罗单一吸入器疗法有可能通过一个吸入器提供完整的哮喘管理方法,在中重度哮喘患者中显示出高水平的疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验