Suppr超能文献

左心室收缩功能障碍的心肌梗死后患者使用佐芬普利、雷米普利和乙酰水杨酸:SMILE-4 研究中高血压患者的回顾性分析。

Zofenopril and ramipril and acetylsalicylic acid in postmyocardial infarction patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a retrospective analysis in hypertensive patients of the SMILE-4 study.

机构信息

Unit of Internal Medicine, Policlinico S. Orsola, University of Bologna, Bologna.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2013 Jun;31(6):1256-64. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283605cd8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antecedent hypertension represents a risk factor for adverse outcomes in survivors of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Prognosis of such patients might be greatly improved by drugs enhancing blood pressure control. In the present retrospective analysis of the randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, SMILE-4 study we compared the efficacy of zofenopril 60 mg and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 100 mg versus ramipril 10 mg and ASA in patients with AMI complicated by left ventricular dysfunction, classified according to a history of hypertension.

METHODS

The primary study end-point was 1-year combined occurrence of death or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes. Hypertension was defined according to medical history and current blood pressure values at entry and could be determined in 682 of 716 patients of the intention-to-treat analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-seven patients (23%) were normotensives and 525 (77%) hypertensives. In the normotensive population the primary end-point occurred in 19 of 76 zofenopril-treated patients (25%) and in 23 of 81 ramipril-treated patients (28%) [odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.84 (0.41-1.71), P = 0.631]. In the hypertensive population, major cardiovascular outcomes were reported in 84 of 273 zofenopril-treated patients (31%) and in 99 of 252 ramipril-treated patients (39%), with a 31% significantly (P = 0.041) lower risk with zofenopril [0.69 (0.48-0.99)]. The superiority of zofenopril versus ramipril was particularly evident in patients with isolated systolic hypertension [n = 131, 0.48 (0.23-0.99), P = 0.045].

CONCLUSION

This retrospective analysis of the SMILE-4 study confirmed the good efficacy of zofenopril and ASA in the prevention of long-term cardiovascular outcomes also in the subgroup of patients with hypertension.

摘要

背景

前驱高血压是急性心肌梗死(AMI)幸存者发生不良预后的一个危险因素。通过增强血压控制的药物,此类患者的预后可能会得到极大改善。在 SMILE-4 研究的这项回顾性、随机、双盲、平行组研究中,我们比较了佐芬普利 60mg 和乙酰水杨酸(ASA)100mg 与雷米普利 10mg 和 ASA 对伴有左心室功能障碍的 AMI 患者的疗效,这些患者根据高血压病史进行分类。

方法

主要研究终点为 1 年时死亡或心血管原因住院的联合发生率。高血压根据病史和入组时的血压值确定,可对意向治疗分析中的 716 例患者中的 682 例进行评估。

结果

157 例(23%)为血压正常者,525 例(77%)为高血压者。在血压正常人群中,主要终点事件发生在 76 例佐芬普利治疗患者中的 19 例(25%)和 81 例雷米普利治疗患者中的 23 例(28%)[比值比(95%置信区间):0.84(0.41-1.71),P=0.631]。在高血压人群中,273 例佐芬普利治疗患者中有 84 例(31%)和 252 例雷米普利治疗患者中有 99 例(39%)发生主要心血管结局,佐芬普利治疗组风险显著降低 31%(P=0.041)[0.69(0.48-0.99)]。佐芬普利与雷米普利的优势在单纯收缩期高血压患者中尤为明显[n=131,0.48(0.23-0.99),P=0.045]。

结论

SMILE-4 研究的这项回顾性分析证实,佐芬普利和 ASA 可有效预防长期心血管结局,在高血压患者亚组中也是如此。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验