Suppr超能文献

疼痛灾难化在多学科康复前后的临床有意义评分:一项对挥鞭样损伤后亚急性疼痛个体的前瞻性研究。

Clinically meaningful scores on pain catastrophizing before and after multidisciplinary rehabilitation: a prospective study of individuals with subacute pain after whiplash injury.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 2014 Mar;30(3):183-90. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31828eee6c.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Pain catastrophizing has emerged as a significant risk factor for problematic recovery after musculoskeletal injury. As such, there has been an increased focus on interventions that target patients' levels of catastrophizing. However, it is not presently clear how clinicians might best interpret scores on catastrophizing before and after treatment. Thus, the purpose of this study was to provide preliminary guidelines for the clinical interpretation of scores on pain catastrophizing among individuals with subacute pain after musculoskeletal injury.

METHODS

A sample of 166 occupationally disabled individuals with subacute pain due to a whiplash injury participated in this study. Participants completed a 7-week standardized multidisciplinary rehabilitation program aimed at fostering functional recovery. Participants completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) upon program commencement and completion. One year later, participants indicated their pain severity and involvement in employment activities. Separate receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were conducted to determine absolute pretreatment and posttreatment and percent change scores on the PCS that were best associated with clinically important levels of pain and employment status at the follow-up.

RESULTS

An absolute pretreatment PCS score of 24 best identified patients according to follow-up clinical outcomes. Posttreatment PCS scores of 14 and 15 best identified patients with high follow-up pain intensity ratings and those who did not return to work, respectively. PCS reductions of approximately 38% to 44% were best associated with return to work and low pain intensity ratings at follow-up.

DISCUSSION

The results indicate scores on catastrophizing before and after treatment that are clinically meaningful. These results may serve as preliminary guidelines to assess the clinical significance of interventions targeting pain catastrophizing in patients with subacute pain after musculoskeletal injury.

摘要

目的

疼痛灾难化已成为肌肉骨骼损伤后出现问题性康复的一个重要危险因素。因此,人们越来越关注针对患者灾难化水平的干预措施。然而,目前尚不清楚临床医生在治疗前后如何最好地解释灾难化评分。因此,本研究的目的是为肌肉骨骼损伤后亚急性疼痛患者的疼痛灾难化评分的临床解释提供初步指南。

方法

本研究纳入了 166 名因挥鞭样损伤而出现亚急性疼痛的职业残疾患者。参与者完成了为期 7 周的标准化多学科康复计划,旨在促进功能恢复。参与者在计划开始和结束时完成疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)。一年后,参与者报告了他们的疼痛严重程度和参与就业活动的情况。分别进行了接收器操作特征曲线分析,以确定与随访时临床重要疼痛水平和就业状况最相关的绝对预处理和治疗后以及 PCS 的百分比变化评分。

结果

绝对预处理 PCS 得分为 24 分,可根据随访临床结果最佳识别患者。治疗后 PCS 得分为 14 分和 15 分,可分别最佳识别出随访时疼痛强度评分较高和未返回工作的患者。PCS 降低约 38%至 44%,与随访时返回工作和低疼痛强度评分最相关。

讨论

结果表明,治疗前后的灾难化评分具有临床意义。这些结果可以作为评估针对肌肉骨骼损伤后亚急性疼痛患者疼痛灾难化的干预措施的临床意义的初步指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验