Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, USA.
JAMA Surg. 2013 Jul;148(7):632-9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.113.
Although prospective randomized data are available to guide the multidisciplinary management of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities, controversy exists regarding adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy.
To determine if clinical specialty introduces bias in recommendations for multimodality treatment of STS.
Electronic survey.
Database of active members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the Society of Surgical Oncology, and the Connective Tissue Oncology Society.
Members of specialty oncology societies with an active interest in STS.
Physician specialty.
Survey responses regarding the multidisciplinary management of STS were scored on a 5-point Likert scale and analyzed using analysis of variance.
The questionnaire was completed by 320 of 490 potential respondents (65%), including medical (18%), radiation (8%), orthopedic (22%), and surgical oncologists (45%). Respondents concurred on the use of radiation therapy for margins positive for tumor, for high-grade tumors, for improvement in local control, for tumors larger than 10 cm, and for tumors in close proximity to a neurovascular bundle. Respondents diverged on the use of radiation therapy for tumors 5 to 10 cm in size, for low-grade tumors, for radiation-associated STS, and for survival benefit. Only radiation oncologists felt that radiation therapy was underutilized as a treatment modality (mean [SEM] Likert scale score, 2.44 [0.12]; P < .001). There was agreement on the use of chemotherapy for synovial sarcoma, for high-grade tumors, for tumors larger than 10 cm, for patients younger than 50 years of age, and for survival benefit. Medical oncologists were more likely to recommend chemotherapy for margins positive for tumor (mean [SEM] score, 3.12 [0.12]; P = .03) and for improvement in local control (mean [SEM] score, 2.91 [0.12] P = .08). Surgical oncologists placed the least emphasis on chemotherapy in the overall treatment plan (mean [SEM] score, 2.60 [0.07]; P = .001).
Specialty bias exists in adjuvant treatment recommendations for STS. This highlights the importance of multidisciplinary STS tumor boards and interdisciplinary care to facilitate consensus decision making for individual patients.
虽然有前瞻性随机数据可用于指导四肢软组织肉瘤(STS)的多学科管理,但对于辅助化疗和放疗仍存在争议。
确定临床专业是否会在 STS 的多模式治疗建议中引入偏见。
电子调查。
美国临床肿瘤学会、外科肿瘤学会和结缔组织肿瘤学会的活跃成员数据库。
对 STS 有浓厚兴趣的专业肿瘤学会成员。
医师专业。
使用 5 分李克特量表对 STS 多学科管理的调查回复进行评分,并使用方差分析进行分析。
在 490 名潜在受访者中,有 320 名(65%)完成了问卷调查,包括内科医生(18%)、放疗医生(8%)、骨科医生(22%)和外科肿瘤医生(45%)。受访者一致认为放疗适用于肿瘤切缘阳性、高级别肿瘤、改善局部控制、肿瘤大于 10cm 以及靠近神经血管束的肿瘤。对于 5 至 10cm 大小的肿瘤、低级别肿瘤、放疗相关 STS 和生存获益,受访者存在分歧。只有放疗医生认为放疗作为一种治疗方式被低估了(平均[SEM]李克特量表评分,2.44[0.12];P<.001)。对于滑膜肉瘤、高级别肿瘤、大于 10cm 的肿瘤、50 岁以下的患者以及生存获益,受访者一致认为化疗适用。内科医生更倾向于推荐化疗用于肿瘤切缘阳性(平均[SEM]评分,3.12[0.12];P=.03)和改善局部控制(平均[SEM]评分,2.91[0.12];P=.08)。外科肿瘤医生在整体治疗计划中对化疗的重视程度最低(平均[SEM]评分,2.60[0.07];P=.001)。
STS 辅助治疗建议存在专业偏见。这凸显了多学科 STS 肿瘤委员会和跨学科护理的重要性,有助于为个体患者做出共识决策。