Vanoli Davide, Lindqvist Per, Wiklund Urban, Henein Michael, Näslund Ulf
Heart Centre and Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
J Clin Ultrasound. 2013 Jul-Aug;41(6):333-9. doi: 10.1002/jcu.22041. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) is generally considered an appropriate direct vascular method for cardiovascular risk assessment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of a newly developed automated on-screen carotid ultrasound with respect to manual measurement with a conventional system.
We assessed CIMT in 50 consecutive patients (age 62 ± 5 years, range 21-79 years, 36 men) twice, using a newly developed automated ultrasound (CardioHealth Station) and a conventional system with manual measurement (Acuson, Sequoia). For each patient, three frozen frames of the distal 10 mm of the right and left common carotid arteries were acquired on the two systems, by operators blinded to each other. The average of the mean value of three readings of each system was calculated.
The intraclass correlation coefficient of the interoperator variability was 0.95 and 0.94 for the automated and manual measurements, respectively. The comparative coefficient of variation of the interoperator variability was 8.2 and 8.7% for the automated and manual measurements, respectively. There was no clinically relevant difference between measurements obtained by the two systems (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.98). The acquisition time of the automated system was significantly shorter than the conventional system (p < 0.01).
Fully automated on-screen measurements of CIMT are feasible, faster, and as reproducible as conventional manual measurements and may be suitable and cost-effective for screening application in community medicine.
颈动脉内膜中层厚度(CIMT)通常被认为是评估心血管风险的一种合适的直接血管测量方法。本研究的目的是评估新开发的自动屏幕式颈动脉超声相对于传统系统手动测量的可行性和可重复性。
我们对50例连续患者(年龄62±5岁,范围21 - 79岁,36例男性)进行了两次CIMT评估,分别使用新开发的自动超声(CardioHealth Station)和传统的手动测量系统(Acuson,Sequoia)。对于每位患者,由互不了解对方操作的操作人员在两个系统上采集左右颈总动脉远端10 mm的三个冻结帧图像。计算每个系统三次读数平均值的平均数。
自动测量和手动测量的操作者间变异的组内相关系数分别为0.95和0.94。自动测量和手动测量的操作者间变异的比较变异系数分别为8.2%和8.7%。两个系统获得的测量结果之间无临床相关差异(组内相关系数 = 0.98)。自动系统的采集时间明显短于传统系统(p < 0.01)。
CIMT的全自动屏幕测量是可行的,速度更快,且与传统手动测量具有相同的可重复性,可能适用于社区医学筛查应用且具有成本效益。