Hepato-Gastroenterology Clinic, DIGIDUNE Pole, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059088. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
We aimed to determine the best algorithms for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients using all available parameters and tests.
We used the database from our study of 507 patients with histologically proven CHC in which fibrosis was evaluated by liver biopsy (Metavir) and tests: Fibrometer®, Fibrotest®, Hepascore®, Apri, ELFG, MP3, Forn's, hyaluronic acid, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP1), MMP1, collagen IV and when possible Fibroscan™. For the first test we used 90% negative predictive value to exclude patients with F≤1, next an induction algorithm was applied giving the best tests with at least 80% positive predictive value for the diagnosis of F≥2. The algorithms were computed using the R Software C4.5 program to select the best tests and cut-offs. The algorithm was automatically induced without premises on the part of the investigators. We also examined the inter-observer variations after independent review of liver biopsies by two pathologists. A medico-economic analysis compared the screening strategies with liver biopsy.
In "intention to diagnose" the best algorithms for F≥2 were Fibrometer ®, Fibrotest®, or Hepascore® in first intention with the ELFG score in second intention for indeterminate cases. The percentage of avoided biopsies varied between 50% (Fibrotest® or Fibrometer®+ELFG) and 51% (Hepascore®+ELFG). In "per-analysis" Fibroscan™+ELFG avoided liver biopsy in 55% of cases. The diagnostic performance of these screening strategies was statistically superior to the usual combinations (Fibrometer® or Fibrotest®+Fibroscan™) and was cost effective. We note that the consensual review of liver biopsies between the two pathologists was mainly in favor of F1 (64-69%).
The ELFG test could replace Fibroscan in most currently used algorithms for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis including for those patients for whom Fibroscan™ is unusable.
我们旨在确定使用所有可用参数和检测方法诊断慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)患者显著纤维化的最佳算法。
我们使用了来自我们的研究的数据库,该研究纳入了 507 例经组织学证实的 CHC 患者,这些患者的纤维化通过肝活检(Metavir)和检测进行评估:Fibrometer®、Fibrotest®、Hepascore®、Apri、ELFG、MP3、Forn's、透明质酸、金属蛋白酶组织抑制剂 1(TIMP1)、MMP1、IV 型胶原,以及在可能的情况下使用 Fibroscan™。对于第一次检测,我们使用 90%的阴性预测值排除纤维化程度≤1 的患者,然后应用诱导算法,对于纤维化程度≥2 的患者,选择至少 80%阳性预测值的最佳检测方法。使用 R 软件 C4.5 程序计算算法,以选择最佳检测方法和临界值。该算法是在研究人员没有任何前提的情况下自动诱导的。我们还检查了两名病理学家独立审查肝活检后的观察者间差异。医疗经济学分析比较了肝活检的筛查策略。
在“意向诊断”中,F≥2 的最佳算法是 Fibrometer ®、Fibrotest®或 Hepascore®作为首选,ELFG 评分作为不确定病例的次选。避免活检的百分比在 50%(Fibrotest®或 Fibrometer®+ELFG)和 51%(Hepascore®+ELFG)之间变化。在“逐个分析”中,Fibroscan™+ELFG 可避免 55%的病例进行肝活检。这些筛查策略的诊断性能在统计学上优于常规组合(Fibrometer®或 Fibrotest®+Fibroscan™),并且具有成本效益。我们注意到,两名病理学家对肝活检的共识审查主要有利于 F1(64-69%)。
ELFG 检测可以替代 Fibroscan 在大多数目前用于诊断显著纤维化的算法中,包括那些无法使用 Fibroscan™的患者。