Suppr超能文献

肝脏硬度测量的陷阱:一项 13369 次检查的 5 年前瞻性研究。

Pitfalls of liver stiffness measurement: a 5-year prospective study of 13,369 examinations.

机构信息

Services d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut Lévêque, Avenue Magellan, 33604 Pessac, France.

出版信息

Hepatology. 2010 Mar;51(3):828-35. doi: 10.1002/hep.23425.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) based on transient elastography (TE, FibroScan) is gaining in popularity for noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis. However, LSM has limitations, which have not yet been thoroughly evaluated. We prospectively investigated the frequency and determinants of LSM failure and unreliable results over a 5-year period, based on 13,369 examinations (134,239 shots). LSM failure was defined as zero valid shots, and unreliable examinations were defined as fewer than 10 valid shots, an interquartile range (IQR)/LSM greater than 30%, or a success rate less than 60%. LSM failure occurred in 3.1% of all examinations (4% at first examination [n = 7261]) and was independently associated at first examination with body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kg/m(2) (odds ratio [OR], 7.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.6-10.2; P = 0.0001), operator experience fewer than 500 examinations (OR 2.5 [1.6-4.0]; P = 0.0001); age greater than 52 years (OR 2.3 [1.6-3.2]; P = 0.0001), and type 2 diabetes (OR 1.6 [1.1-2.2]; P = 0.009). Unreliable results were obtained in a further 15.8% of cases (17% at first examination) and were independently associated at first examination with BMI greater than 30 kg/m(2) (OR 3.3 [2.8-4.0]; P = 0.0001), operator experience fewer than 500 examinations (OR 3.1 [2.4-3.9]; P = 0.0001), age greater than 52 years (OR 1.8 [1.6-2.1]; P = 0.0001), female sex (OR 1.4 [1.2-1.6], P = 0.0001), hypertension (OR 1.3 [1.1-1.5]; P = 0.003), and type 2 diabetes (OR 1.2 [1.0-1.5]; P = 0.05). When metabolic syndrome and waist circumference were taken into account in a subgroup of 2835 patients, waist circumference was the most important determinant of LSM failure and unreliable results.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, liver stiffness measurements are uninterpretable in nearly one in five cases. The principal reasons are obesity, particularly increased waist circumference, and limited operator experience. These results emphasize the need for adequate operator training and for technological improvements in specific patient subpopulations.

摘要

目的

探讨基于瞬时弹性成像(TE,FibroScan)的肝硬度测量(LSM)在非侵入性评估肝纤维化中的应用。然而,LSM 存在局限性,尚未得到充分评估。

方法

我们前瞻性研究了 5 年内 13369 次检查(134239 次检测)中 LSM 失败和不可靠结果的频率和决定因素。LSM 失败定义为零个有效检测,不可靠检查定义为少于 10 个有效检测、四分位距(IQR)/LSM 大于 30%或成功率小于 60%。

结果

所有检查中 LSM 失败的发生率为 3.1%(首次检查中为 4%[n=7261]),首次检查时与 BMI 大于 30kg/m2(比值比[OR],7.5;95%置信区间[CI],5.6-10.2;P=0.0001)、操作者经验少于 500 次(OR 2.5[1.6-4.0];P=0.0001)、年龄大于 52 岁(OR 2.3[1.6-3.2];P=0.0001)和 2 型糖尿病(OR 1.6[1.1-2.2];P=0.009)独立相关。进一步有 15.8%的病例获得不可靠结果(首次检查中为 17%),与 BMI 大于 30kg/m2(OR 3.3[2.8-4.0];P=0.0001)、操作者经验少于 500 次(OR 3.1[2.4-3.9];P=0.0001)、年龄大于 52 岁(OR 1.8[1.6-2.1];P=0.0001)、女性(OR 1.4[1.2-1.6],P=0.0001)、高血压(OR 1.3[1.1-1.5];P=0.003)和 2 型糖尿病(OR 1.2[1.0-1.5];P=0.05)独立相关。在 2835 例患者的亚组中,当考虑代谢综合征和腰围时,腰围是 LSM 失败和不可靠结果的最重要决定因素。

结论

根据我们的经验,近五分之一的肝硬度测量结果无法解释。主要原因是肥胖,尤其是腰围增加,以及操作者经验有限。这些结果强调了对操作者进行适当培训以及对特定患者亚群进行技术改进的必要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验