Simpson Andrew T
Department of History, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2013 Apr;68(2):163-97. doi: 10.1093/jhmas/jrr053. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
In 1966, morticians provided 50 percent of ambulance services in the United States; today advanced care by trained medical professionals en route to the hospital is considered a basic standard of care. The creation of emergency medical services (EMS) provides an important case study for how physicians acting as "experts" helped to shape the creation of federal policy in the post-World War II years. This paper challenges a narrative of the development of EMS that has emphasized technology, individual agency, and the role of fortuitous chance as the prime movers of EMS development. Instead it argues that a key factor in EMS development was the National Academy of Science-National Research Council's Committee on Emergency Medical Services. Using the examples of paramedic training and ambulance design, this paper argues that members of the committee utilized complex mix of local experimentation and professional networking to suggest directions for the federal government's efforts to create national standards and guidelines for EMS. The NAS-NRC Committee retained a prominent role in EMS development until the passage of the Emergency Medical Services Systems Act of 1973, when federal interest in EMS largely shifted from prehospital transport to an emphasis on in hospital care and regional trauma systems planning.
1966年,美国的殡仪业者提供了50%的救护车服务;如今,由训练有素的医疗专业人员在送往医院途中提供的高级护理被视为基本护理标准。紧急医疗服务(EMS)的创建为二战后医生作为“专家”如何帮助塑造联邦政策的制定提供了一个重要的案例研究。本文对紧急医疗服务发展的一种叙述提出了质疑,这种叙述强调技术、个别机构以及偶然机会在紧急医疗服务发展中的推动作用。相反,它认为紧急医疗服务发展的一个关键因素是美国国家科学院-国家研究委员会紧急医疗服务委员会。本文以护理人员培训和救护车设计为例,认为该委员会成员利用地方试验和专业网络的复杂组合,为联邦政府制定紧急医疗服务国家标准和指南的努力指明方向。在1973年《紧急医疗服务系统法案》通过之前,美国国家科学院-国家研究委员会委员会在紧急医疗服务发展中一直发挥着重要作用,当时联邦政府对紧急医疗服务的关注主要从院前运输转向对医院护理和区域创伤系统规划的重视。