• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊医生如何使用生物标志物:来自脚本一致性测试定性评估的见解

How emergency physicians use biomarkers: insights from a qualitative assessment of script concordance tests.

作者信息

Claessens Yann-Erick, Wannepain Sophie, Gestin Stéphanie, Magdelein Xavier, Ferretti Elsa, Guilly Marine, Charlin Bernard, Pelaccia Thierry

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace, , Principalty of Monaco, Monaco.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2014 Mar;31(3):238-41. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-202303. Epub 2013 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1136/emermed-2012-202303
PMID:23558149
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Biomarkers have been developed in emergency medicine to improve decision at bedside using Bayesian approach. We intend to determine the cognitive process actually utilised by emergency physicians to incorporate biomarkers in clinical reasoning.

DESIGN

We invited eight emergency physicians to answer eight script concordance tests. Interviews were tape-recorded and qualitatively analysed using predetermined categories until saturation.

RESULTS

Emergency physicians mainly mobilised intuition and non-Bayesian reasoning to incorporate biomarkers for diagnosis or treatment strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Although biomarkers have been developed to be used in a Bayesian approach, emergency physicians mainly use other analytical and non-analytical cognitive processes to introduce these tools in their clinical reasoning.

摘要

目的

在急诊医学中已开发出生物标志物,以使用贝叶斯方法改善床边决策。我们旨在确定急诊医生在临床推理中纳入生物标志物时实际采用的认知过程。

设计

我们邀请了八位急诊医生回答八个脚本一致性测试。访谈进行了录音,并使用预定类别进行定性分析,直至达到饱和状态。

结果

急诊医生主要运用直觉和非贝叶斯推理来纳入生物标志物以制定诊断或治疗策略。

结论

尽管已开发出生物标志物用于贝叶斯方法,但急诊医生主要使用其他分析性和非分析性认知过程将这些工具引入其临床推理中。

相似文献

1
How emergency physicians use biomarkers: insights from a qualitative assessment of script concordance tests.急诊医生如何使用生物标志物:来自脚本一致性测试定性评估的见解
Emerg Med J. 2014 Mar;31(3):238-41. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-202303. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
2
Assessing clinical reasoning using a script concordance test with electrocardiogram in an emergency medicine clerkship rotation.在急诊医学实习轮转中,使用心电图脚本一致性测试评估临床推理能力。
Emerg Med J. 2014 Apr;31(4):313-6. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201737. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
3
Assessing clinical reasoning in pediatric emergency medicine: validity evidence for a Script Concordance Test.评估儿科急诊医学中的临床推理:一份脚本一致性测试的效度证据
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 May;53(5):647-52. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.07.024. Epub 2008 Aug 22.
4
Experienced physician descriptions of intuition in clinical reasoning: a typology.经验丰富的医生对临床推理中直觉的描述:一种类型学
Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 Aug 27;6(3):259-268. doi: 10.1515/dx-2018-0069.
5
Assessing clinical reasoning skills in scenarios of uncertainty: convergent validity for a Script Concordance Test in an emergency medicine clerkship and residency.评估不确定性情境下的临床推理技能:急诊实习和住院医师培训中脚本一致性测试的收敛效度。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Jun;18(6):627-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01084.x.
6
A Novel Approach to Study Medical Decision Making in the Clinical Setting: The "Own-point-of-view" Perspective.一种在临床环境中研究医学决策的新方法:“自身观点”视角。
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Jul;24(7):785-795. doi: 10.1111/acem.13209. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
7
Experiential and rational decision making: a survey to determine how emergency physicians make clinical decisions.经验决策和理性决策:一项调查急诊医师如何做出临床决策的研究。
Emerg Med J. 2012 Oct;29(10):811-6. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200468. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
8
Contextual information influences diagnosis accuracy and decision making in simulated emergency medicine emergencies.语境信息会影响模拟急诊医学紧急情况中的诊断准确性和决策制定。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Jun;22(6):478-84. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000972. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
9
Role of intuitive knowledge in the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists: a focus group study.直觉知识在医院专家诊断推理中的作用:一项焦点小组研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 28;9(1):e022724. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022724.
10
How and when do expert emergency physicians generate and evaluate diagnostic hypotheses? A qualitative study using head-mounted video cued-recall interviews.专家急诊医师如何以及何时生成和评估诊断假设?一项使用头戴式视频提示回忆访谈的定性研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Dec;64(6):575-85. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining response process validity of script concordance testing: a think-aloud approach.检验脚本一致性测试的反应过程效度:出声思维法。
Int J Med Educ. 2020 Jun 24;11:127-135. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5eb6.7be2.