Center for Orphan Drug Research, University of Minnesota, United States.
Epilepsy Res. 2013 Aug;105(3):362-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2013.02.018. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
Diazepam rectal gel (Diastat(®)) is the only FDA-approved product indicated for acute repetitive seizures. Despite its proven efficacy, most older children and adults object to this route of administration. As a result, many patients do not realize the benefit of a therapy that can improve outcomes and decrease healthcare costs. Intranasal administration of benzodiazepines offers a potential alternative. The primary objective of this study was to compare the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of two novel intranasal (IN) diazepam (DZP) formulations versus intravenous (IV) administration in healthy volunteers. Twenty-four healthy volunteers were randomized into an open-label, three-way crossover study. 10mg doses of two investigational intranasal DZP formulations (solution, suspension) and a 5mg IV dose of commercially available DZP injectable, USP were given. A two-week washout period separated treatments. Plasma samples for DZP analysis were collected pre-dose and at regular intervals up to 240 h post-dose. DZP concentration-time data were analyzed using a non-compartmental pharmacokinetics approach. Exposure following administration of DZP IN solution (absolute bioavailability - 97%) was greater than the IN suspension (absolute bioavailability - 67%). Mean Cmaxvalues for the suspension and solution formulations were 221 ng/mL and 272 ng/mL, respectively. Median time to maximum concentration (Tmax) was 1h and 1.5h for suspension and solution formulation, respectively. Both investigational intranasal formulations were well tolerated. The results of this pilot study indicate that development of an intranasal diazepam formulation with high bioavailability, reasonable variability, and good tolerability is feasible.
地西泮直肠凝胶(Diastat(®))是唯一经 FDA 批准用于急性重复发作的产品。尽管其疗效已得到证实,但大多数年龄较大的儿童和成人都反对这种给药途径。因此,许多患者没有意识到这种可以改善治疗效果和降低医疗成本的治疗方法的好处。苯二氮䓬类药物的鼻腔内给药提供了一种潜在的替代方法。本研究的主要目的是比较两种新型鼻腔内(IN)地西泮(DZP)制剂与静脉内(IV)给药在健康志愿者中的生物利用度和药代动力学。24 名健康志愿者被随机分为开放标签、三向交叉研究。给予两种研究性鼻腔内 DZP 制剂(溶液、混悬液)的 10mg 剂量和市售的 5mg IV 地西泮可注射 USP 剂量。两种治疗方法之间有两周的洗脱期。在给药前和给药后 240 小时定期采集用于 DZP 分析的血浆样本。使用非房室药代动力学方法分析 DZP 浓度-时间数据。DZP IN 溶液给药后的暴露(绝对生物利用度 - 97%)大于 IN 混悬液(绝对生物利用度 - 67%)。混悬液和溶液制剂的 Cmax 平均值分别为 221ng/mL 和 272ng/mL。混悬液和溶液制剂的 Tmax 中位数分别为 1 小时和 1.5 小时。两种研究性鼻腔内制剂均耐受良好。这项初步研究的结果表明,开发具有高生物利用度、合理变异性和良好耐受性的鼻腔内地西泮制剂是可行的。