Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Epilepsia. 2020 Mar;61(3):455-464. doi: 10.1111/epi.16449. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
The study assesses the bioavailability of diazepam after intranasal administration (diazepam nasal spray) in healthy volunteers. Comparative agents were diazepam rectal gel, which served as the regulatory reference product; and oral diazepam, a product with decades of clinical use. Tolerability of diazepam nasal spray was also assessed.
This was a phase 1, open-label, randomized, single-dose, three-treatment, three-period, six-sequence crossover study in 48 healthy adult subjects that consisted of a screening period, a baseline period, and an open-label treatment period. Interperiod intervals were at least 28 days.
Forty-eight healthy volunteer subjects were enrolled, two of whom discontinued before receiving study medication. For all routes of administration, the onset of diazepam absorption was rapid, with measurable concentrations of drug present by the first sample time point. The t (time to reach maximum plasma concentration) was similar for diazepam nasal spray and diazepam rectal gel, both of which were slower than oral diazepam in fasted individuals. Variability (as defined by % coefficient of variation of geometric mean) in peak plasma concentration and area under the curve was lowest with oral diazepam, followed by diazepam nasal spray, with diazepam rectal gel showing the greatest variability. Overall, 131 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were considered mild (42 subjects, 91.3%), four TEAEs were considered moderate (four subjects, 8.3%), and no TEAEs were considered severe. The most commonly reported TEAE was somnolence at 56.5% (26/46) during diazepam nasal spray treatment, 89.1% (41/46) with the rectal diazepam gel treatment, and 82.6% (38/46) with oral diazepam treatment. No nasal irritation was observed for the majority of the subjects at any time point after administration, with no score higher than 2 ("minor bleeding that stops within 1 minute").
Diazepam nasal spray shows predicable pharmacokinetics and represents a potential novel therapeutic approach to control bouts of increased seizure activity (cluster seizures, acute repetitive seizures).
研究评估了健康志愿者经鼻腔给予地西泮后的生物利用度(地西泮鼻喷雾剂)。比较制剂为地西泮直肠凝胶,作为监管参考产品;和口服地西泮,一种具有数十年临床应用的产品。还评估了地西泮鼻喷雾剂的耐受性。
这是一项 48 名健康成年受试者参与的 1 期、开放标签、随机、单剂量、三治疗、三周期、六序列交叉研究,包括筛选期、基线期和开放标签治疗期。每个周期之间的间隔至少为 28 天。
共纳入 48 名健康志愿者,其中 2 名在接受研究药物前退出。对于所有给药途径,地西泮的吸收起始迅速,第一个采样时间点即可检测到药物的浓度。地西泮鼻喷雾剂和地西泮直肠凝胶的达峰时间(t)相似,两者在禁食个体中均比口服地西泮慢。口服地西泮时,峰血浆浓度和曲线下面积的变异性(定义为几何均数的%变异系数)最低,其次是地西泮鼻喷雾剂,地西泮直肠凝胶的变异性最大。总体而言,131 次治疗出现的不良事件(TEAE)被认为是轻度(42 例,91.3%),4 次 TEAE 被认为是中度(4 例,8.3%),没有 TEAE 被认为是重度。报告最多的治疗出现的不良事件是地西泮鼻喷雾剂治疗时的嗜睡,发生率为 56.5%(26/46),直肠地西泮凝胶治疗时为 89.1%(41/46),口服地西泮治疗时为 82.6%(38/46)。大多数受试者在给药后的任何时间点都没有观察到鼻腔刺激,没有评分高于 2 分(“在 1 分钟内停止的轻微出血”)。
地西泮鼻喷雾剂显示出可预测的药代动力学特征,代表了控制癫痫发作加剧(簇状发作、急性反复性发作)的潜在新型治疗方法。