Suppr超能文献

胸主动脉腔内支架修复术治疗伴动脉瘤样变的慢性 B 型主动脉夹层的疗效。

Efficacy of thoracic endovascular stent repair for chronic type B aortic dissection with aneurysmal degeneration.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jul;58(1):10-7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.071. Epub 2013 Apr 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Food and Drug Administration has approved devices for endovascular management of thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR); however, limited data exist describing the outcomes of TEVAR for aneurysms attributable to chronic type B aortic dissection (cTBAD). This study was undertaken to determine the results of endovascular treatment of cTBAD with aneurysmal degeneration.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all patients treated for cTBAD with aneurysmal degeneration at the University of Florida from 2004 to 2011 was performed. Computed tomograms with centerline reconstruction were analyzed to determine change in aortic diameter, relative proportions of aortic treatment lengths, and false lumen perfusion status. Reintervention and mortality were estimated using life-tables. Cox regression analysis was completed to predict mortality.

RESULTS

Eighty patients underwent TEVAR for aneurysm due to cTBAD (mean age [± standard deviation], 60 ± 13 years [male, 87.5%; n = 70]; median follow-up, 26 [range, 1-74] months). Median time from diagnosis of TBAD to TEVAR was 16 (range, 1-72) months. Prior aortic root/arch replacement had been performed in 29% (n = 23) at a median interval of 28.5 (range, 0.5-312) months. Mean preoperative aneurysm diameter was 62.0 ± 9.9 mm. In 75% (n = 60) of cases, coverage was proximal to zone 3, and 24% (n = 19) underwent carotid-subclavian bypass or other arch debranching procedure. Spinal drains were used in 78% (pre-op 71%, n = 57; post-op 6%, n = 5). Length of stay was 6.5 ± 4.7 days with a composite morbidity of 26% and in-hospital mortality of 2.5% (n = 2). Overall neurologic event rate was 17% (spinal cord ischemia 10% [n = 8], with a permanent deficit observed in 6.2% [n = 5]; stroke 7.5%). Aneurysm diameter reduced or stabilized in 65%. The false lumen thrombosed completely within the thoracic aorta in 52%, and reintervention within the treated aortic segment was required in 16% (n = 13).One- and 3-year freedom from reintervention (with 95% confidence interval [CI]) was 80% (range, 68%-88%) and 70% (range, 57%-80%), respectively. Survival at 1 and 5 years was 89% (range, 80%-94%) and 70% (range, 55%-81%) and was not significantly different among patients requiring reintervention or experiencing favorable aortic remodeling. Multivariable analysis identified coronary artery disease (hazard ratio [HR], 6.4; 95% CI, 2.3-17.7; P < .005), prior infrarenal aortic surgery (HR, 8.6; 95% CI, 2.3-31.7; P = .001), and congestive heart failure (HR, 11.9; 95% CI, 1.9-73.8; P = .008) as independent risk factors for mortality. Hyperlipidemia was found to be protective (HR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.05-0.6; P = .004). No significant difference in predictors of mortality were found between patients who underwent reintervention vs those who did not (P = .2).

CONCLUSIONS

TEVAR for cTBAD with aneurysmal degeneration can be performed safely but spinal cord ischemia rates may be higher than previously reported. Liberal use of procedural adjuncts to reduce this complication, such as spinal drainage, is recommended. Reintervention is common, but long-term survival does not appear to be impacted by remediation.

摘要

背景

美国食品和药物管理局已批准用于胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)的血管内治疗设备;然而,关于可归因于慢性 B 型主动脉夹层(cTBAD)的动脉瘤的 TEVAR 结果,数据有限。本研究旨在确定腔内治疗伴动脉瘤样变的 cTBAD 的结果。

方法

对 2004 年至 2011 年期间在佛罗里达大学接受治疗的所有因 cTBAD 伴动脉瘤样变的患者进行回顾性分析。分析计算机断层扫描的中心线重建,以确定主动脉直径的变化、主动脉治疗长度的相对比例以及假腔的灌注状态。使用生命表估计再干预和死亡率。完成 Cox 回归分析预测死亡率。

结果

80 例患者因 cTBAD 导致的动脉瘤接受 TEVAR 治疗(平均年龄[±标准差],60±13 岁[男性,87.5%;n=70];中位随访时间 26[范围 1-74]个月)。从 TBAD 诊断到 TEVAR 的中位时间为 16(范围 1-72)个月。29%(n=23)的患者在中位间隔 28.5(范围 0.5-312)个月内行主动脉根部/弓部置换。术前平均动脉瘤直径为 62.0±9.9mm。75%(n=60)的病例覆盖范围近端至第 3 区,24%(n=19)行颈动脉-锁骨下旁路或其他弓部去分支手术。78%(术前 71%,n=57;术后 6%,n=5)使用了脊髓引流管。住院时间为 6.5±4.7 天,复合发病率为 26%,住院死亡率为 2.5%(n=2)。总体神经事件发生率为 17%(脊髓缺血 10%[n=8],6.2%[n=5]有永久性损伤;中风 7.5%)。65%的患者动脉瘤直径缩小或稳定。52%的胸主动脉内完全血栓形成假腔,16%(n=13)的患者需要在治疗的主动脉节段进行再干预。1 年和 3 年免于再干预(95%置信区间[CI])分别为 80%(范围 68%-88%)和 70%(范围 57%-80%)。1 年和 5 年的生存率分别为 89%(范围 80%-94%)和 70%(范围 55%-81%),在需要再干预或有良好主动脉重塑的患者之间没有显著差异。多变量分析确定冠状动脉疾病(风险比[HR],6.4;95%CI,2.3-17.7;P<.005)、肾下主动脉手术史(HR,8.6;95%CI,2.3-31.7;P=.001)和充血性心力衰竭(HR,11.9;95%CI,1.9-73.8;P=.008)是死亡的独立危险因素。高脂血症是保护性的(HR,0.2;95%CI,0.05-0.6;P=.004)。在再干预与未再干预的患者之间,未发现死亡率预测因素有显著差异(P=.2)。

结论

腔内治疗伴动脉瘤样变的 cTBAD 是安全的,但脊髓缺血的发生率可能高于先前报道。建议使用程序辅助手段(如脊髓引流)来降低这种并发症的发生率。再干预很常见,但长期生存率似乎不受矫正的影响。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of thoracic endovascular stent repair for chronic type B aortic dissection with aneurysmal degeneration.
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jul;58(1):10-7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.071. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
2
3
Outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in adult coarctation patients.
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Feb;67(2):369-381.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.06.103. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
6
Open repair of chronic distal aortic dissection in the endovascular era: Implications for disease management.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Oct;144(4):866-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.021. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
7
Efficacy of intentional undersized thoracic endovascular repair for Stanford type B aortic dissection.
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Aug;80(2):355-364. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.04.043. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
8
Short- and Long-term Results of Hybrid Arch and Proximal Descending Thoracic Aortic Repair: A Benchmark for New Technologies.
J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Oct;23(5):783-90. doi: 10.1177/1526602816655446. Epub 2016 Jun 19.
9
Implications of secondary aortic intervention after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute and chronic type B dissection.
J Vasc Surg. 2019 May;69(5):1367-1378. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.080. Epub 2018 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

2
Efficacy of endovascular circulating false lumen occlusion in chronic aneurysmal descending aortic dissections.
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2025 Jul 8;31(4):384-391. doi: 10.4274/dir.2025.242986. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
4
Type Ib endoleak repaired with a thoracic endovascular graft inside previous visceral debranching bypass in a patient with chronic type B aortic dissection.
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2023 Apr 12;9(2):101186. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101186. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
Changing Management of Type B Aortic Dissections.
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2023 Mar 7;19(2):59-69. doi: 10.14797/mdcvj.1171. eCollection 2023.
9
A Novel Solution for Distal Dilation of Chronic Dissection After Repair Involving Visceral Branches: The Road Block Strategy.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 9;9:821260. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.821260. eCollection 2022.
10
Thoracic endovascular repair of chronic type B aortic dissection: a systematic review.
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Jan;11(1):1-15. doi: 10.21037/acs-2021-taes-25.

本文引用的文献

2
Aortic remodeling after endovascular repair with stainless steel-based stent graft in acute and chronic type B aortic dissection.
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jun;55(6):1600-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.008. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
3
Preliminary findings in quantification of changes in septal motion during follow-up of type B aortic dissections.
J Vasc Surg. 2012 May;55(5):1419-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.127. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
4
Propensity score-matched analysis of open surgical and endovascular repair for type B aortic dissection.
Int J Vasc Med. 2011;2011:364046. doi: 10.1155/2011/364046. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
5
Volumetric analysis of type B aortic dissections treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair.
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Oct;54(4):985-92; discussion 992. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.263. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
6
A systematic review of mid-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) of chronic type B aortic dissection.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Nov;42(5):632-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
7
Reporting standards for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Oct;52(4):1022-33, 1033.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.07.008.
8
Open and endovascular repair of type B aortic dissection in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Oct;52(4):860-6; discussion 866. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.008.
10
Midterm results for endovascular repair of complicated acute and chronic type B aortic dissection.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Jan;89(1):97-102; discussion 102-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.09.029.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验