Suppr超能文献

妇产科实践和患者保险类型。

Obstetrics and gynecology practices and patient insurance type.

机构信息

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Department of Psychology, Washington, DC 20024, USA.

出版信息

Womens Health Issues. 2013 May-Jun;23(3):e161-5. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Apr 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite research on health disparities based on insurance status, little is known about the differences in practice patterns among physicians who cater to privately and non-privately insured patients. The aim of this study was to assess how obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns) who primarily see patients with private insurance differ from those who see mainly uninsured or publicly insured patients. This could be informative of the needs of these two groups of physicians and patients.

METHODS

A questionnaire was mailed or emailed to 1,000 members of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 600 of whom participate in the Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network.

FINDINGS

A 56.4% response rate was obtained. Of the valid responders, the 335 reported providing care to a majority of patients with private insurance ("private group") and the 105 reported providing care to mostly publicly insured or uninsured patients ("non-private group") were included in our analyses. Differences between groups included that the private group was more likely to see patients before their becoming pregnant and spent more time on well-woman care. The private group was more likely to see patients who are White, Asian, or between the ages of 45 and 64. The non-private group was more likely to see Hispanic patients and those under age 18.

CONCLUSION

Results reveal that ob-gyns who see mostly privately insured patients have different clinical experiences than those who see mainly uninsured or publicly insured patients in terms of patient characteristics, preconception care, distribution of time on activities, and the of likelihood performing certain procedures and screening tests.

摘要

背景

尽管有关于保险状况的健康差异的研究,但对于迎合私人保险和非私人保险患者的医生的实践模式差异知之甚少。本研究旨在评估主要为私人保险患者服务的妇产科医生与主要为无保险或公共保险患者服务的医生有何不同。这可以为这两组医生和患者的需求提供信息。

方法

向 1000 名美国妇产科学院成员邮寄或电子邮件发送了一份问卷,其中 600 名成员参加了合作门诊研究网络。

结果

我们获得了 56.4%的回复率。在有效的应答者中,335 名报告主要为私人保险患者提供护理(“私人组”),105 名报告主要为公共保险或无保险患者提供护理(“非私人组”),他们的分析包括在内。两组之间的差异包括,私人组更有可能在患者怀孕前就诊,并在女性健康护理上花费更多时间。私人组更有可能看到白人、亚裔或 45 至 64 岁之间的患者。非私人组更有可能看到西班牙裔患者和 18 岁以下的患者。

结论

结果表明,在患者特征、孕前护理、活动时间分配以及进行某些程序和筛查测试的可能性方面,主要为私人保险患者服务的妇产科医生与主要为无保险或公共保险患者服务的医生的临床经验不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验