Complexité, Innovation, Activités Motrices et Sportives (CIAMS), Université Paris-Sud, F-91405 Orsay, France.
Neurosci Lett. 2013 May 24;543:32-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.02.061. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
This research deals with the postural adjustments that occur after the end of a voluntary movement ("Consecutive Postural Adjustments": CPAs). With the aim of more fully characterizing the postural component of motor tasks, they are compared with those occurring before movement onset ("anticipatory postural adjustments": APAs). Ten male adults were asked to perform a single step as quickly as possible to a target marked on the ground (STEP). A force plate measured the resultant reaction forces along the antero-posterior axis (Rx) and the Centre of Pressure (CoP) displacements along the antero-posterior and lateral axes (Xp and Yp). The velocity of the Centre of Gravity (COG) along the antero-posterior axis was calculated and the peak velocity (termed "progression velocity": VxG) was measured. Antero-posterior linear impulses (∫Rxdt) were also calculated. Two step lengths were considered: a short and a long one (SS and LS conditions). Each session consisted of ten steps. The antero-posterior force time course presented two phases: a positive one that included the APA and the STEP periods, then a negative one corresponding to CPA. The corresponding backward impulse (CPIx) was equal to the forward one (BPIx), which identifies CPA as a counter-perturbation, that is, a process by which the central nervous system controls and stops a forward impulse. CPA durations and peak amplitudes (dCPA and pCPA) were significantly greater than the corresponding APA values (dAPA and pAPA). Moreover, when the step length was greater, that is, when the progression velocity was faster, pCPAs, like pAPAs, increased, suggesting that CPAs and APAs are parts of the same motor program. In addition, CPA duration and time to peak amplitude do not vary with progression velocity, which could be explained by the movement braking constraints. Finally, CPA can be viewed as a means of achieving a new "static" postural equilibrium as soon as possible after foot contact, and to prevent the risk of falling. The outcome provides additional knowledge on how a stable posture is achieved at the end of a task movement, and is discussed from a postural control perspective.
本研究探讨了自主运动结束后发生的姿势调整(“连续姿势调整”:CPAs)。为了更全面地描述运动任务的姿势成分,将其与运动开始前发生的姿势调整(“预期姿势调整”:APAs)进行比较。10 名成年男性被要求尽快向地面上标记的目标迈出一步(STEP)。力板测量沿前后轴(Rx)的合成反作用力和沿前后轴和侧轴(Xp 和 Yp)的压力中心(CoP)位移。重心(COG)沿前后轴的速度被计算,峰值速度(称为“进展速度”:VxG)被测量。还计算了前后线性冲量(∫Rxdt)。考虑了两种步长:短步长和长步长(SS 和 LS 条件)。每个会话由十个步骤组成。前向后力时间历程呈现两个阶段:一个正相,包括 APA 和 STEP 期,然后是一个负相,对应于 CPA。相应的向后冲量(CPIx)等于向前冲量(BPIx),这表明 CPA 是一种反扰,即中枢神经系统控制并停止向前冲量的过程。CPA 持续时间和峰值幅度(dCPA 和 pCPA)明显大于相应的 APA 值(dAPA 和 pAPA)。此外,当步长较大时,即进展速度较快时,pCPAs 与 pAPAs 一样增加,表明 CPAs 和 APAs 是同一运动程序的一部分。此外,CPA 持续时间和达到峰值幅度的时间不会随进展速度而变化,这可以用运动制动约束来解释。最后,CPA 可以被视为一种在脚接触后尽快达到新的“静态”姿势平衡的手段,并防止跌倒的风险。研究结果提供了关于在任务运动结束时如何实现稳定姿势的更多知识,并从姿势控制的角度进行了讨论。