CIAMS, université Paris-Sud, université Paris-Saclay, 91405 Orsay cedex, France; CIAMS, université d'Orléans, Orléans, France.
LPM, université Paris-Sud, université Paris-Saclay, 91405 Orsay cedex, France.
Neurophysiol Clin. 2018 Dec;48(6):387-396. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
This paper examines the postural adjustments that occur after the end of a voluntary movement (consecutive postural adjustments, CPAs). Its aim is to reinforce the theory that CPAs are necessary to counterbalance the destabilizing effect of a voluntary movement. In addition, we compared the main features of CPAs with those of anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) in order to gather evidence that could afford new insights into postural programming.
Nine healthy adults were invited to adopt a sitting position to perform nine pointing movements at decreasing velocities. The antero-posterior component of the reaction forces was measured. Upper limb kinematics were recorded and the kinetics calculated. The main features under study included linear impulses, peak amplitudes and duration of CPAs and APAs.
Two main results emerged from our study: the impulse produced after the end of a focal movement (CPAI) was negative, while the impulse produced before its end (ASPI) was positive; their absolute values were not significantly different; when movement velocity increased, CPA impulse and peak amplitude (pCPA) increased significantly, contrary to duration (dCPA). Furthermore, APA impulse, peak amplitude and duration were all increased.
These findings on pointing movements strengthen the hypothesis that CPAs play a role of body stabilization and that the postural chain kinetics is programmed according to focal movement velocity. Evidence on CPA obtained from healthy subjects may contribute to the further specification of the differences associated with motor impairment.
本文研究了自愿运动结束后发生的姿势调整(连续姿势调整,CPAs)。其目的是加强 CPAs 是抵消自愿运动的不稳定性效应的必要理论。此外,我们比较了 CPAs 和预期姿势调整(APAs)的主要特征,以收集能够为姿势编程提供新见解的证据。
邀请 9 名健康成年人采用坐姿,以降低速度进行 9 次指向运动。测量反作用力的前后分量。记录上肢运动学并计算动力学。研究的主要特征包括 CPAs 和 APAs 的线性脉冲、峰值幅度和持续时间。
我们的研究得出了两个主要结果:焦点运动结束后产生的脉冲(CPAI)为负,而运动结束前产生的脉冲(ASPI)为正;它们的绝对值没有显著差异;随着运动速度的增加,CPAs 脉冲和峰值幅度(pCPA)显著增加,而持续时间(dCPA)则相反。此外,APAs 脉冲、峰值幅度和持续时间都增加了。
这些指向运动的发现加强了 CPAs 发挥身体稳定作用的假设,并且姿势链动力学根据焦点运动速度进行编程。从健康受试者获得的关于 CPAs 的证据可能有助于进一步说明与运动障碍相关的差异。