Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA, Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Cambridge, MA, USA, Department of Social Science, Indian Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India and MRC Centre for Causal Analyses in Translational Epidemiology (CAiTE), School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, UK.
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Oct;42(5):1410-26. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt017. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
There has been an increased focus on non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in India, especially on cardiovascular diseases and associated risk factors. In this essay, we scrutinize the prevailing narrative that cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) are no longer confined to the economically advantaged groups but are an increasing burden among the poor in India. We conducted a comprehensive review of studies reporting the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and CVRF, CVD, and CVD-related mortality in India. With the exception of smoking and low fruit and vegetable intake, the studies clearly suggest that CVRF/CVD is more prevalent among high SES groups in India than among the low SES groups. Although CVD-related mortality rates appear to be higher among the lower SES groups, the proportion of deaths from CVD-related causes was found to be greatest among higher SES groups. The studies on SES and CVRF/CVD also reveal a substantial discrepancy between the data presented and the authors' interpretations and conclusions, along with an unsubstantiated claim that a reversal in the positive SES-CVRF/CVD association has occurred or is occurring in India. We conclude our essay by emphasizing the need to prioritize public health policies that are focused on the health concerns of the majority of the Indian population. Resource allocation in the context of efforts to make health care in India free and universal should reflect the proportional burden of disease on different population groups if it is not to entrench inequity.
印度越来越关注非传染性疾病(NCDs),尤其是心血管疾病和相关风险因素。在本文中,我们仔细研究了一种流行的说法,即心血管风险因素(CVRF)和心血管疾病(CVD)不再局限于经济优势群体,而是印度贫困人口日益加重的负担。我们对报告印度社会经济地位(SES)与 CVRF、CVD 和 CVD 相关死亡率之间关系的研究进行了全面综述。除了吸烟和低水果和蔬菜摄入量外,这些研究清楚地表明,CVRF/CVD 在印度的高 SES 群体中比低 SES 群体更为普遍。尽管 CVD 相关死亡率似乎在较低 SES 群体中较高,但发现较高 SES 群体中 CVD 相关死亡的比例最大。SES 和 CVRF/CVD 的研究还揭示了数据呈现与作者解释和结论之间存在实质性差异,以及一种未经证实的说法,即印度的 SES-CVRF/CVD 关联已经发生或正在发生逆转。我们在强调需要优先考虑关注印度大多数人口健康问题的公共卫生政策的结论中结束了本文。在努力使印度的医疗保健免费和普及的背景下,资源分配应反映不同人群群体疾病负担的比例,如果不这样做,就会加剧不平等。