Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Sleep. 2013 Apr 1;36(4):591-6. doi: 10.5665/sleep.2552.
The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) guidelines for polysomnography (PSG) scoring are increasingly being adopted worldwide, but the agreement among international centers in scoring respiratory events and sleep stages using these guidelines is unknown. We sought to determine the interrater agreement of PSG scoring among international sleep centers.
Prospective study of interrater agreement of PSG scoring.
Nine center-members of the Sleep Apnea Genetics International Consortium (SAGIC).
Fifteen previously recorded deidentified PSGs, in European Data Format, were scored by an experienced technologist at each site after they were imported into the locally used analysis software. Each 30-sec epoch was manually scored for sleep stage, arousals, apneas, and hypopneas using the AASM recommended criteria. The computer-derived oxygen desaturation index (ODI) was also recorded. The primary outcome for analysis was the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). The ICCs of the respiratory variables were: AHI = 0.95 (95% confidence interval: 0.91-0.98), total apneas = 0.77 (0.56-0.87), total hypopneas = 0.80 (0.66-0.91), and ODI = 0.97 (0.93-0.99). The kappa statistics for sleep stages were: wake = 0.78 (0.77-0.79), nonrapid eye movement = 0.77 (0.76-0.78), N1 = 0.31 (0.30-0.32), N2 = 0.60 (0.59-0.61), N3 = 0.67 (0.65-0.69), and rapid eye movement = 0.78 (0.77-0.79). The ICC of the arousal index was 0.68 (0.50-0.85).
There is strong agreement in the scoring of respiratory events among the SAGIC centers. There is also substantial epoch-by-epoch agreement in scoring sleep variables. Our results suggest that centralized scoring of PSGs may not be necessary in future research collaboration among international sites where experienced, well-trained scorers are involved.
美国睡眠医学学会(AASM)的多导睡眠图(PSG)评分指南在全球范围内被越来越多地采用,但国际中心使用这些指南对呼吸事件和睡眠阶段进行评分的一致性尚不清楚。我们旨在确定国际睡眠中心之间 PSG 评分的组内一致性。
PSG 评分组内一致性的前瞻性研究。
睡眠呼吸暂停遗传学国际联合会(SAGIC)的九个中心成员。
将 15 份以前记录的、以欧洲数据格式(European Data Format)存储的、已识别的 PSG 记录导入各中心本地使用的分析软件后,由一位经验丰富的技术员进行评分。使用 AASM 推荐的标准,每个 30 秒的时相都要手动评分睡眠阶段、觉醒、呼吸暂停和低通气。还记录了计算机衍生的氧减饱和指数(ODI)。分析的主要结果是呼吸暂停-低通气指数(AHI)的组内相关系数(ICC)。呼吸变量的 ICC 如下:AHI = 0.95(95%置信区间:0.91-0.98),总呼吸暂停=0.77(0.56-0.87),总低通气=0.80(0.66-0.91),ODI=0.97(0.93-0.99)。睡眠阶段的kappa 统计量为:觉醒=0.78(0.77-0.79),非快速眼动=0.77(0.76-0.78),N1=0.31(0.30-0.32),N2=0.60(0.59-0.61),N3=0.67(0.65-0.69),快速眼动=0.78(0.77-0.79)。觉醒指数的 ICC 为 0.68(0.50-0.85)。
SAGIC 中心之间在呼吸事件的评分方面具有高度一致性。在睡眠变量的评分方面,也存在大量逐时相的一致性。我们的结果表明,在涉及经验丰富、训练有素的评分员的国际站点之间进行未来的研究合作时,可能不需要对 PSG 进行集中评分。