• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[公共部门的药品获取:巴西统一国家卫生系统使用者分析]

[Access to medicines in the public sector: analysis of users of the Brazilian Unified National Health System].

作者信息

Boing Alexandra Crispim, Bertoldi Andréa Dâmaso, Boing Antonio Fernando, Bastos João Luiz, Peres Karen Glazer

机构信息

Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brasil.

出版信息

Cad Saude Publica. 2013 Apr;29(4):691-701.

PMID:23568299
Abstract

This study aimed to describe the prevalence of access to medicines in the Brazilian Unified National Health System and associated factors among patients that received prescriptions in the public system. The study analyzed data from the National Household Sample Survey (2008). The sample consisted of individuals with prescriptions written in the National Health System in the two weeks prior to the interview (n = 19,427). The dependent variable was access to all the prescribed medicines inside the system itself. Slightly fewer than half of the sample with prescriptions received the medicines in the public health system; the proportions were higher in the South of Brazil, among black patients, those with less schooling and lower income, and those registered in the Family Health Strategy. When analyzing prescriptions written by the private sector, access to all the prescribed drugs was associated with higher income, higher education, and white skin color. The results emphasize the need for policies to decrease inequalities in access to medicines in Brazil.

摘要

本研究旨在描述巴西统一国家卫生系统中获得药品的情况以及在公共系统中接受处方的患者的相关因素。该研究分析了全国家庭抽样调查(2008年)的数据。样本包括在访谈前两周内在国家卫生系统开具过处方的个人(n = 19427)。因变量是在系统内部获得所有处方药品的情况。略少于一半的有处方样本在公共卫生系统中获得了药品;在巴西南部、黑人患者、受教育程度较低和收入较低的人群以及家庭健康战略登记的人群中,这一比例较高。在分析私营部门开具的处方时,获得所有处方药与较高收入、较高教育程度和白人肤色相关。结果强调了巴西需要制定政策来减少获得药品方面的不平等现象。

相似文献

1
[Access to medicines in the public sector: analysis of users of the Brazilian Unified National Health System].[公共部门的药品获取:巴西统一国家卫生系统使用者分析]
Cad Saude Publica. 2013 Apr;29(4):691-701.
2
[Use and sources of medicines: a population-based study in Campinas, São Paulo State, Brazil].[药物的使用与来源:巴西圣保罗州坎皮纳斯市基于人群的研究]
Cad Saude Publica. 2016 Jan;32(1). doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00067814. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
3
[Inequality in Brazilian women's access to medicines for chronic diseases].[巴西女性获取慢性病药物方面的不平等]
Cad Saude Publica. 2015 Jul;31(7):1416-26. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00083614.
4
Access to prescribed medicine in the Brazilian adult population.巴西成年人口获得处方药的情况。
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2018;21:e180007. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720180007. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
5
Access to medicines in Brazil based on monetary and non-monetary acquisition data obtained from the 2008/2009 Household Budget Survey.基于2008/2009年家庭预算调查获得的货币和非货币购买数据,分析巴西的药品获取情况。
Rev Saude Publica. 2016 Dec 22;50:79. doi: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050006635.
6
[Sources of medicines for chronic patients using the Brazilian Unified National Health System].[使用巴西统一国家卫生系统的慢性病患者的药品来源]
Cad Saude Publica. 2018 Mar 26;34(3):e00073817. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00073817.
7
Access to medicines, the Unified Health System, and intersectional injustices.药品可及性、全民健康覆盖和交叉性不公正。
Rev Saude Publica. 2024 Aug 9;58:34. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2024058005986. eCollection 2024.
8
Use, access, and equity in health care services in São Paulo, Brazil.巴西圣保罗医疗服务的使用、可及性与公平性。
Cad Saude Publica. 2017 May 18;33(4):e00078015. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00078015.
9
Access to medication in the Public Health System and equity: populational health surveys in São Paulo, Brazil.巴西圣保罗的公共卫生系统中的药物可及性与公平性:人群健康调查
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2016 Mar;19(1):26-37. doi: 10.1590/1980-5497201600010003.
10
[Prevalence rates and inequalities in access to medicines by users of the Brazilian Unified National Health System in 2013 and 2019].[2013年和2019年巴西统一国家卫生系统使用者获取药品的患病率及不平等情况]
Cad Saude Publica. 2022 Jun 8;38(6):e00114721. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XPT114721. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
[Access to medicines for the treatment of systemic arterial hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Brazilian population: data from the 2019 Brazilian National Health Survey].[巴西人群中用于治疗系统性动脉高血压和2型糖尿病的药物可及性:来自2019年巴西全国健康调查的数据]
Cad Saude Publica. 2024 Sep 16;40(8):e00241022. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XPT241022. eCollection 2024.
2
Access to medicines, the Unified Health System, and intersectional injustices.药品可及性、全民健康覆盖和交叉性不公正。
Rev Saude Publica. 2024 Aug 9;58:34. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2024058005986. eCollection 2024.
3
Access to medicines among the Brazilian population based on the 2019 National Health Survey.
基于 2019 年国家健康调查的巴西人口的药品可及性。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 20;18(1):e0280599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280599. eCollection 2023.
4
Indicators of the line of care for people with diabetes in Brazil: National Health Survey 2013 and 2019.巴西糖尿病患者护理线指标:2013 年和 2019 年国家健康调查。
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2022 Aug 8;31(spe1):e2021382. doi: 10.1590/SS2237-9622202200011.especial. eCollection 2022.
5
Effects and implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on medicine use by employees of a Brazilian public university: a cross-sectional study.新冠疫情对巴西某公立大学员工用药的影响及其意义:一项横断面研究。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2022 Mar-Apr;140(2):250-260. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2021.0367.R1.23072021.
6
An analysis of face-mask performance from a volunteer mask-making initiative in Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.对巴西里贝朗普雷图一项志愿者口罩制作倡议中的口罩性能分析。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2021 Nov;2:100094. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2021.100094. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
7
Catastrophic health expenditure and multimorbidity among older adults in Brazil.巴西老年人灾难性卫生支出与多病共存。
Rev Saude Publica. 2020 Dec 14;54:125. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002285. eCollection 2020.
8
Free access to medicines among older adults in primary care: a cross-sectional study.基层医疗中老年人免费获取药物情况:一项横断面研究。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2020 Jun;138(3):235-243. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2019.0541.R1.19022020. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
9
Institutional strategies as a mechanism to rationalize the negative effects of the judicialization of access to medicine in Brazil.机构策略作为一种机制,以合理化巴西获得药物司法化的负面影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 3;20(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4929-9.
10
Use of antibiotics in the health care unit: 2015 Pelotas Birth Cohort.医疗保健单位抗生素使用情况:2015 年佩洛塔斯出生队列研究。
Rev Saude Publica. 2019 Oct 17;53:92. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2019053001477. eCollection 2019.