University of South Carolina/Palmetto Health-Neuropsychiatry, Columbia, South Carolina 29203, USA.
Telemed J E Health. 2013 Jun;19(6):474-9. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0182. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
This study characterized and examined factors influencing psychiatry residents' and fellows' interest, exposure, and future plans to use telepsychiatry.
A 17-item electronic survey was distributed to 485 psychiatry residency and fellowship programs in the United States. Each program director or administrator was asked to voluntarily distribute the survey to his or her trainees. Chi-squared tests were performed to test differences in proportions. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression was used to model outcomes of interest.
In total, 283 respondents completed the survey. A majority of respondents were interested in telepsychiatry and felt that it was an important part of training. Of the 50 respondents who had clinical exposure to telepsychiatry and completed the survey, most reported that their experience increased their interest level, and two-thirds reported having either a one-time encounter or less than 6 h of multiple patient experiences via telepsychiatry. Clinical exposure to telepsychiatry was significantly related to level of training (p=0.001) and program location (p=0.005). Residents in their postgraduate year (PGY) 4 or fellowship were 2.6 times more likely to be exposed to clinical telepsychiatry than PGY 1-3 residents (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41-4.95). Residents and fellows in rural programs were 4.3 times more likely to be exposed than those in urban or suburban settings (95% CI 1.07-17.28). Factors affecting trainees' plans to use telepsychiatry in their future practice include program location (p=0.013) and interest level (p<0.001). Residents and fellows in rural locations were 9.3 times more likely to report future plans to use telepsychiatry (95% CI 1.88-45.71).
There is a practice gap between resident interest and resident exposure to telepsychiatry. Training programs should consider incorporating a brief telepsychiatry experience to fulfill both resident interest and the growing demand for psychiatrists.
本研究描述并考察了精神病学住院医师和研究员对远程精神病学的兴趣、接触程度以及未来使用计划的影响因素。
对美国 485 个精神病学住院医师和研究员培训项目进行了一项 17 项内容的电子调查。要求每位项目主任或管理员自愿将调查分发给他们的学员。采用卡方检验比较比例差异。采用逐步多变量逻辑回归对感兴趣的结果进行建模。
共有 283 名受访者完成了调查。大多数受访者对远程精神病学感兴趣,并认为这是培训的重要组成部分。在 50 名对远程精神病学有临床接触并完成调查的受访者中,大多数人报告说他们的经验增加了他们的兴趣水平,三分之二的人报告说他们通过远程精神病学进行了一次性或少于 6 小时的多次患者接触。远程精神病学的临床接触与培训水平(p=0.001)和项目地点(p=0.005)显著相关。在住院医师 4 年级或研究员阶段的住院医师比住院医师 1-3 年级的住院医师更有可能接触到临床远程精神病学(95%置信区间 [CI] 1.41-4.95)。农村项目的住院医师和研究员比城市或郊区项目的住院医师和研究员更有可能接触到远程精神病学(95% CI 1.07-17.28)。影响学员未来在实践中使用远程精神病学计划的因素包括项目地点(p=0.013)和兴趣水平(p<0.001)。农村地区的住院医师和研究员报告未来使用远程精神病学计划的可能性是城市或郊区地区的住院医师和研究员的 9.3 倍(95% CI 1.88-45.71)。
住院医师对远程精神病学的兴趣与住院医师对远程精神病学的接触之间存在实践差距。培训计划应考虑纳入简短的远程精神病学体验,以满足住院医师的兴趣和对精神科医生日益增长的需求。