• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替莫唑胺与司莫司汀治疗复发性恶性胶质瘤的多中心随机对照研究

[Multicenter randomized controlled study of temozolomide versus semustine in the treatment of recurrent malignant glioma].

作者信息

Sun Jian, Yang Xue-jun, Yang Shu-yuan

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Jan 15;93(3):165-8.

PMID:23570586
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of temozolomide (TMZ) versus semustine (Me-CCNU) in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) or anaplastic astrocytoma (AA).

METHODS

A total of 151 patients with recurrent GBM or AA were enrolled into this randomized, multicentre and open-label study. And 144 patients (intent-to-treat (ITT) population) were assigned randomly into 2 groups. TMZ was given orally at 200 or 150 mg×m(-2)d(-1) (prior chemotherapy) for 5 days, repeated every 28 days. Me-CCNU was given orally at 150 mg×m(-2)×d(-1) once, repeated every 28 days. The treatment periods were within 2 - 6 months and the follow-up period was 6 months. Gadopentetate dimeglumine-magnetic resonance imaging (GD-MRI) or contrast-enhanced computed tomography was performed at 2, 3 and 6 months after treatment to evaluate the image-based progression. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival rates at the end of follow-up period and adverse events rates were evaluated.

RESULTS

PFS at 6 months was 78.87% in TMZ group and 55.88% in Me-CCNU group (P < 0.05). Overall survival rates at the end of follow-up period were 96.89% in TMZ group and 97.30% in Me-CCNU group (P > 0.05). The objective response rate of TMZ and Me-CCNU groups were complete response (CR) (19.44% vs 6.38%), partial response (PR) (26.39% vs 14.89%), stable disease (SD) (26.39% vs 34.03%) and progressive disease (PD) (27.78% vs 44.68%, P < 0.01). Adverse events rates of TMZ and Me-CCNU were 29.11% and 45.15% respectively (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of TMZ for patients with recurrent GBM or AA is better than that of Me-CCNU. And TMZ has an acceptable safety profile and its adverse events are mostly mild.

摘要

目的

评估替莫唑胺(TMZ)与司莫司汀(Me-CCNU)治疗复发性多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)或间变性星形细胞瘤(AA)的疗效和安全性。

方法

151例复发性GBM或AA患者纳入这项随机、多中心、开放标签研究。144例患者(意向性治疗(ITT)人群)随机分为两组。TMZ在化疗前按200或150mg×m⁻²d⁻¹口服5天,每28天重复一次。Me-CCNU按150mg×m⁻²×d⁻¹口服一次,每28天重复一次。治疗期为2至6个月,随访期为6个月。治疗后2、3和6个月进行钆喷酸葡胺磁共振成像(GD-MRI)或增强计算机断层扫描以评估基于影像学的进展情况。评估无进展生存期(PFS)、随访期末的总生存率和不良事件发生率。

结果

TMZ组6个月时的PFS为78.87%,Me-CCNU组为55.88%(P<0.05)。随访期末的总生存率TMZ组为96.89%,Me-CCNU组为97.30%(P>0.05)。TMZ组和Me-CCNU组的客观缓解率分别为完全缓解(CR)(19.44%对6.38%)、部分缓解(PR)(26.39%对14.89%)、疾病稳定(SD)(26.39%对34.03%)和疾病进展(PD)(27.78%对44.68%,P<0.01)。TMZ和Me-CCNU的不良事件发生率分别为29.11%和45.15%(P<0.05)。

结论

TMZ治疗复发性GBM或AA患者的疗效优于Me-CCNU。且TMZ具有可接受的安全性,其不良事件大多为轻度。

相似文献

1
[Multicenter randomized controlled study of temozolomide versus semustine in the treatment of recurrent malignant glioma].替莫唑胺与司莫司汀治疗复发性恶性胶质瘤的多中心随机对照研究
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Jan 15;93(3):165-8.
2
Multicenter phase II trial of temozolomide in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma or anaplastic oligoastrocytoma at first relapse. Temodal Brain Tumor Group.替莫唑胺用于间变性星形细胞瘤或间变性少突星形细胞瘤首次复发患者的多中心II期试验。替莫唑胺脑肿瘤研究组。
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Sep;17(9):2762-71. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.9.2762.
3
[A multicenter randomized controlled study of temozolomide in 97 patients with malignant brain glioma].[替莫唑胺治疗97例恶性脑胶质瘤的多中心随机对照研究]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Aug 4;89(29):2059-62.
4
A first feasibility study of temozolomide for Japanese patients with recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma multiforme.替莫唑胺用于日本复发性间变性星形细胞瘤和多形性胶质母细胞瘤患者的首次可行性研究。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2003 Oct;8(5):301-4. doi: 10.1007/s10147-003-0339-3.
5
Temozolomide in radio-chemotherapy combined treatment for newly-diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: phase II clinical trial.替莫唑胺在新诊断多形性胶质母细胞瘤放化疗联合治疗中的应用:II期临床试验
Anticancer Res. 2003 Nov-Dec;23(6D):5159-64.
6
Phase II trial of continuous dose-intense temozolomide in recurrent malignant glioma: RESCUE study.复发恶性胶质瘤连续剂量密集替莫唑胺的 II 期试验:RESCUE 研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 20;28(12):2051-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.5520. Epub 2010 Mar 22.
7
Temozolomide rechallenge in recurrent malignant glioma by using a continuous temozolomide schedule: the "rescue" approach.采用替莫唑胺持续给药方案对复发性恶性胶质瘤进行替莫唑胺再激发治疗:“挽救”方法
Cancer. 2008 Oct 15;113(8):2152-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23813.
8
Combination of 6-thioguanine, capecitabine, and celecoxib with temozolomide or lomustine for recurrent high-grade glioma.替莫唑胺或洛莫司汀联合 6-硫鸟嘌呤、卡培他滨和塞来昔布治疗复发性高级别胶质瘤。
J Neurooncol. 2011 Apr;102(2):273-80. doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0313-7. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
9
A phase II study of temozolomide vs. procarbazine in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse.一项针对多形性胶质母细胞瘤首次复发患者的替莫唑胺与丙卡巴肼对比的II期研究。
Br J Cancer. 2000 Sep;83(5):588-93. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1316.
10
Temozolomide in the treatment of recurrent malignant glioma in Chinese patients.替莫唑胺治疗中国患者复发性恶性胶质瘤
Hong Kong Med J. 2005 Dec;11(6):452-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy for recurrent high-grade glioma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.复发性高级别胶质瘤药物治疗的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jun 1;14:1191480. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1191480. eCollection 2023.
2
Treatment options for progression or recurrence of glioblastoma: a network meta-analysis.治疗胶质母细胞瘤进展或复发的选择:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 4;5(1):CD013579. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013579.pub2.
3
Treating malignant glioma in Chinese patients: update on temozolomide.
中国患者恶性胶质瘤的治疗:替莫唑胺的最新进展
Onco Targets Ther. 2014 Feb 12;7:235-44. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S41336. eCollection 2014.