Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals of Schleswig-Holstein, University of Kiel, Schittenhelmstrasse 7, Kiel, Germany.
Acta Derm Venereol. 2013 Sep 4;93(5):515-9. doi: 10.2340/00015555-1533.
Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) have an epidermal barrier dysfunction, which allows invasion of allergens to occur. Stratum corneum skin barrier is formed by corneocytes and extracellular lipids extruded from the epidermal lamellar bodies. In a controlled, randomized, double-blinded, right-left comparison study we investigated the effect of pimecrolimus (PIM) cream compared with triamcinolone acetonide cream (TA) on the skin barrier in 15 patients with symmetrical elbow lesions of AD. In punch biopsies, before and after treatment, skin lipid bilayer and lamellar body structure were examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Partial Eczema Area and Severity Index (pEASi), stratum corneum hydration, and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) were monitored on days 1, 8 and 22. The pEASi was significantly more improved with TA compared with PIM, whereas stratum corneum hydration was slightly more improved after treatment with PIM. The TEM revealed a strong reduction in lamellar bodies in lesional skin of AD; only 32% of the lamellar bodies were normal. A significantly higher number of normal lamellar bodies was found after 3 weeks of treatment with PIM (58%; p < 0.005). An increase in lamellar bodies also occurred with TA treatment (46%; p < 0.05); however, significantly less than with PIM (p < 0.05). Clinical score and TEWL were more improved after treatment with TA, whereas the lamellar bodies were more normal after treatment with PIM.
特应性皮炎(AD)患者表皮屏障功能障碍,使过敏原得以入侵。角质层皮肤屏障由角质形成细胞和从表皮板层小体挤出的细胞外脂质组成。在一项对照、随机、双盲、左右对比研究中,我们研究了吡美莫司(PIM)乳膏与曲安奈德(TA)乳膏对 15 例 AD 对称肘部病变患者皮肤屏障的影响。在治疗前后,通过透射电子显微镜(TEM)检查皮肤脂质双层和板层小体结构。在第 1、8 和 22 天监测部分湿疹面积和严重程度指数(pEASi)、角质层含水量和经表皮水分流失(TEWL)。与 PIM 相比,TA 治疗的 pEASi 明显改善,而 PIM 治疗后角质层含水量略有改善。TEM 显示 AD 病变皮肤的板层小体明显减少;只有 32%的板层小体正常。PIM 治疗 3 周后,正常板层小体的数量明显增加(58%;p<0.005)。TA 治疗也导致板层小体增加(46%;p<0.05);然而,与 PIM 相比显著减少(p<0.05)。TA 治疗后的临床评分和 TEWL 改善更明显,而 PIM 治疗后的板层小体更正常。