Gorouhi Farzam, Solhpour Amirreza, Beitollahi Jalil Momen, Afshar Shahla, Davari Parastoo, Hashemi Pantea, Nassiri Kashani Mansour, Firooz Alireza
Center for Research and Training in Skin Diseases and Leprosy, Medical Sciences/University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Nov;57(5):806-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.06.022. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
Lichen planus is a common chronic inflammatory mucocutaneous disease, affecting 0.1% to 4% of the general population. There is no published randomized active control clinical trial on pimecrolimus for the treatment of oral lichen planus (OLP).
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus 1% cream with triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% paste in treating OLP.
In this investigator-blinded parallel-group randomized clinical trial, 40 patients were randomly assigned in two equal groups to receive either pimecrolimus 1% cream or triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% paste 4 times daily for a total of 2 months and followed up for another 2 months. The patients were assessed for painful symptoms measured by visual analog scale, the Oral Health Impact Profile score, and objective clinical score. Nonparametric tests were used to assess the main outcomes. Intention-to-treat analysis was used.
Eighteen patients in pimecrolimus group and 17 patients in triamcinolone group finished the 4-month trial course. Both pimecrolimus and triamcinolone groups showed significant improvement in all measured efficacy end points throughout the visits. There was no significant difference between changes from baseline median values of pimecrolimus and triamcinolone groups after treatment termination in terms of visual analog scale score (-9.8 +/- 11.3 vs -8.4 +/- 18.3, P = .70), Oral Health Impact Profile score (-1.5 +/- 2.6 vs -1.6 +/- 2.1, P = .38), and clinical score (-0.7 +/- 0.6 vs -0.8 +/- 0.7, P = .86), respectively. Two patients in pimecrolimus group experienced prominent but transient burning sensation whereas none of the patients in triamcinolone group had any prominent adverse event (P = .24).
Blood levels in pimecrolimus group were not measured and carcinogenicity of pimecrolimus, especially in its long-term use for OLP, is yet to be determined.
This study showed that patients with OLP may benefit from both topical pimecrolimus and triamcinolone acetonide therapy with minimal side effects. Further studies should be conducted to assess the maintenance effects and long-term safety of both drugs (Cochrane skin group identifier: CSG TrialNo. 22).
扁平苔藓是一种常见的慢性炎症性黏膜皮肤疾病,影响着0.1%至4%的普通人群。目前尚无关于吡美莫司治疗口腔扁平苔藓(OLP)的已发表随机活性对照临床试验。
本研究旨在比较1%吡美莫司乳膏与0.1%曲安奈德糊剂治疗OLP的疗效和安全性。
在这项研究者设盲的平行组随机临床试验中,40例患者被随机分为两组,每组20例,分别接受1%吡美莫司乳膏或0.1%曲安奈德糊剂,每日4次,共治疗2个月,并随访2个月。通过视觉模拟量表、口腔健康影响量表评分和客观临床评分评估患者的疼痛症状。采用非参数检验评估主要结局。采用意向性分析。
吡美莫司组18例患者和曲安奈德组17例患者完成了4个月的试验疗程。吡美莫司组和曲安奈德组在整个随访期间所有测量的疗效终点均有显著改善。治疗结束后,吡美莫司组和曲安奈德组从基线中位数变化后的视觉模拟量表评分(-9.8±11.3 vs -8.4±18.3,P = 0.70)、口腔健康影响量表评分(-1.5±2.6 vs -1.6±2.1,P = 0.38)和临床评分(-0.7±0.6 vs -0.8±0.7,P = 0.86)方面均无显著差异。吡美莫司组有2例患者出现明显但短暂的烧灼感,而曲安奈德组无一例患者出现任何明显不良事件(P = 0.24)。
未检测吡美莫司组的血药浓度,吡美莫司的致癌性,尤其是其长期用于OLP的致癌性尚未确定。
本研究表明,OLP患者可能从局部使用吡美莫司和曲安奈德治疗中获益,且副作用最小。应进一步开展研究以评估两种药物的维持效果和长期安全性(Cochrane皮肤组标识符:CSG TrialNo. 22)。