Suppr超能文献

一个使用广义线性模型进行稳健关联检验、估计和遗传模型选择的统一框架。

A unifying framework for robust association testing, estimation, and genetic model selection using the generalized linear model.

作者信息

Loley Christina, König Inke R, Hothorn Ludwig, Ziegler Andreas

机构信息

1] Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universität zu Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany [2] Medizinische Klinik II, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2013 Dec;21(12):1442-8. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.62. Epub 2013 Apr 10.

Abstract

The analysis of genome-wide genetic association studies generally starts with univariate statistical tests of each single-nucleotide polymorphism. The standard approach is the Cochran-Armitage trend test or its logistic regression equivalent although this approach can lose considerable power if the underlying genetic model is not additive. An alternative is the MAX test, which is robust against the three basic modes of inheritance. Here, the asymptotic distribution of the MAX test is derived using the generalized linear model together with the Delta method and multiple contrasts. The approach is applicable to binary, quantitative, and survival traits. It may be used for unrelated individuals, family-based studies, and matched pairs. The approach provides point and interval effect estimates and allows selecting the most plausible genetic model using the minimum P-value. R code is provided. A Monte-Carlo simulation study shows that the asymptotic MAX test framework meets type I error levels well, has good power, and good model selection properties for minor allele frequencies ≥0.3. Pearson's χ(2)-test is superior for lower minor allele frequencies with low frequencies for the rare homozygous genotype. In these cases, the model selection procedure should be used with caution. The use of the MAX test is illustrated by reanalyzing findings from seven genome-wide association studies including case-control, matched pairs, and quantitative trait data.

摘要

全基因组遗传关联研究的分析通常从对每个单核苷酸多态性进行单变量统计检验开始。标准方法是 Cochr an - Armitage 趋势检验或其逻辑回归等效方法,不过,如果潜在的遗传模型不是加性的,这种方法可能会损失相当大的检验效能。另一种方法是 MAX 检验,它对三种基本遗传模式具有稳健性。在此,使用广义线性模型结合 Delta 方法和多重对比推导 MAX 检验的渐近分布。该方法适用于二元性状、定量性状和生存性状。它可用于无关个体、基于家系的研究以及匹配对。该方法提供点估计和区间效应估计,并允许使用最小 P 值选择最合理的遗传模型。文中提供了 R 代码。一项蒙特卡罗模拟研究表明,对于次要等位基因频率≥0.3 的情况,渐近 MAX 检验框架能很好地满足 I 型错误水平,具有良好的检验效能和良好的模型选择特性。对于次要等位基因频率较低且罕见纯合基因型频率也较低的情况,Pearson 卡方检验更具优势。在这些情况下,应谨慎使用模型选择程序。通过重新分析来自七项全基因组关联研究的结果(包括病例对照、匹配对和定量性状数据)来说明 MAX 检验的应用。

相似文献

1
2
Maximizing association statistics over genetic models.
Genet Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;32(3):246-54. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20299.
4
Semiparametric Allelic Tests for Mapping Multiple Phenotypes: Binomial Regression and Mahalanobis Distance.
Genet Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;39(8):635-50. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21930. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
5
Joint association analysis of a binary and a quantitative trait in family samples.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Jan;25(1):130-136. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.134. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
6
Power comparison of Cochran-Armitage trend test against allelic and genotypic tests in large-scale case-control genetic association studies.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Sep;27(9):2657-2673. doi: 10.1177/0962280216683979. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
7
Signatures of negative selection in the genetic architecture of human complex traits.
Nat Genet. 2018 May;50(5):746-753. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0101-4. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
9
A rapid gene-based genome-wide association test with multivariate traits.
Hum Hered. 2013;76(2):53-63. doi: 10.1159/000356016. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
10
A robust method for testing association in genome-wide association studies.
Hum Hered. 2012;73(1):26-34. doi: 10.1159/000334719. Epub 2011 Dec 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Genome-wide association studies on malaria in Sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review.
PLoS One. 2025 May 16;20(5):e0309268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309268. eCollection 2025.
2
Association of gene polymorphism (rs724016) with height and fetal hemoglobin in individuals with sickle cell anemia.
Mol Genet Metab Rep. 2024 May 17;39:101086. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2024.101086. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Genome-wide association testing in malaria studies in the presence of overdominance.
Malar J. 2023 Apr 10;22(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12936-023-04533-2.
6
Decomposing Pearson's χ test: A linear regression and its departure from linearity.
Ann Hum Genet. 2018 Sep;82(5):318-324. doi: 10.1111/ahg.12257. Epub 2018 May 31.
7
Genetic model misspecification in genetic association studies.
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Nov 7;10(1):569. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2911-3.
8
Differentiating the Cochran-Armitage Trend Test and Pearson's χ Test: Location and Dispersion.
Ann Hum Genet. 2017 Sep;81(5):184-189. doi: 10.1111/ahg.12202. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
10
Nonadditive Effects of Genes in Human Metabolomics.
Genetics. 2015 Jul;200(3):707-18. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.175760. Epub 2015 May 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Genome-wide association study indicates two novel resistance loci for severe malaria.
Nature. 2012 Sep 20;489(7416):443-6. doi: 10.1038/nature11334. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
2
Cochran-Armitage test versus logistic regression in the analysis of genetic association studies.
Hum Hered. 2012;73(1):14-7. doi: 10.1159/000334085. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
3
Robust Mantel-Haenszel test under genetic model uncertainty allowing for covariates in case-control association studies.
Genet Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;35(7):695-705. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20620. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
4
Association tests for X-chromosomal markers--a comparison of different test statistics.
Hum Hered. 2011;71(1):23-36. doi: 10.1159/000323768. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
5
Robust association tests under different genetic models, allowing for binary or quantitative traits and covariates.
Behav Genet. 2011 Sep;41(5):768-75. doi: 10.1007/s10519-011-9450-9. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
6
Robust tests for matched case-control genetic association studies.
BMC Genet. 2010 Oct 12;11:91. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-11-91.
7
8
What's the best statistic for a simple test of genetic association in a case-control study?
Genet Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;34(3):246-53. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20455.
10
Bayesian statistical methods for genetic association studies.
Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Oct;10(10):681-90. doi: 10.1038/nrg2615.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验