• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

艾滋病患者的呼吸衰竭:是否需要重症监护?

Respiratory failure in the patient with AIDS: is critical care warranted?

作者信息

Szaflarski N L

出版信息

AACN Clin Issues Crit Care Nurs. 1990 May;1(1):215-24. doi: 10.4037/15597768-1990-1022.

DOI:10.4037/15597768-1990-1022
PMID:2357441
Abstract

The issue of whether or not the life-sustaining treatments (LST) of critical care is warranted for patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) experiencing acute respiratory failure has been raised. Factors that have contributed to this issue include the AIDS epidemic, the high costs of critical care, limited intensive care resources, high mortality, prolonged suffering, and the effects on caregivers in delivering futile care. This article examines this issue from the ethicality of the decision-making process regarding LST in context with medical futility, patient autonomy, and discussion among patients and caregivers. The allocation of critical care resources for AIDS patients with respiratory failure is analyzed from the viewpoint of distributive justice. The nursing implications of providing critical care to these patients and their families are discussed as well as needed areas of research.

摘要

对于患有获得性免疫缺陷综合征(艾滋病)且出现急性呼吸衰竭的患者,是否有必要进行重症监护的维持生命治疗(LST)这一问题已经被提了出来。导致这个问题的因素包括艾滋病的流行、重症监护的高昂成本、有限的重症监护资源、高死亡率、长期的痛苦以及对护理人员提供无效护理的影响。本文从关于维持生命治疗决策过程的伦理角度,结合医疗无效性、患者自主权以及患者与护理人员之间的讨论,审视了这个问题。从分配正义的角度分析了为患有呼吸衰竭的艾滋病患者分配重症监护资源的情况。还讨论了为这些患者及其家属提供重症监护的护理意义以及所需的研究领域。

相似文献

1
Respiratory failure in the patient with AIDS: is critical care warranted?艾滋病患者的呼吸衰竭:是否需要重症监护?
AACN Clin Issues Crit Care Nurs. 1990 May;1(1):215-24. doi: 10.4037/15597768-1990-1022.
2
Critical care of patients with AIDS.艾滋病患者的重症监护
JAMA. 1992;267(4):541-7.
3
Patient choice, cost, and survival of critically ill cancer patients: a societal dilemma.重症癌症患者的患者选择、成本与生存:一个社会困境。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1993;120(1-2):3-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01200716.
4
Ethical dilemmas about intensive care for patients with AIDS.关于艾滋病患者重症监护的伦理困境。
Rev Infect Dis. 1987 Nov-Dec;9(6):1163-7. doi: 10.1093/clinids/9.6.1163.
5
Life-sustaining treatment for patients with AIDS.艾滋病患者的生命维持治疗。
Chest. 1989 Mar;95(3):647-52. doi: 10.1378/chest.95.3.647.
6
Point and counterpoint. Should HECs consider financial costs of care during case review? A reply.正方与反方观点。医疗伦理委员会在病例审查期间是否应考虑医疗护理的财务成本?一则回应。
HEC Forum. 1992;4(4):269-70; discussion 271. doi: 10.1007/BF00057789.
7
The AIDS patient and the last ICU bed: scarcity, medical futility, and ethics.艾滋病患者与最后一张重症监护病床:稀缺、医疗无效及伦理问题。
QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1991 Jun;17(6):175-81. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30455-9.
8
Withdrawal of life support against family wishes: is it justified? A case study.违背家属意愿撤除生命维持治疗:是否合理?一项案例研究。
J Clin Ethics. 1990 Spring;1(1):74-9; discussion 79-84.
9
Ethical principles in critical care.重症监护中的伦理原则。
JAMA. 1990 Feb 2;263(5):696-700.
10
Silent decisions: limits of consent and the terminally ill patient.
Law Med Health Care. 1988 Fall-Winter;16(3-4):204-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1988.tb01947.x.