• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

编码流畅性与项目难度对学习判断的影响分离

Separation of encoding fluency and item difficulty effects on judgements of learning.

作者信息

Undorf Monika, Erdfelder Edgar

机构信息

a Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences , University of Mannheim , Mannheim , Germany.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(10):2060-72. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.777751. Epub 2013 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1080/17470218.2013.777751
PMID:23574510
Abstract

The fluency of information encoding has frequently been discussed as a major determinant of predicted memory performance indicated by judgements of learning (JOLs). Previous studies established encoding fluency effects on JOLs. However, it is largely unknown whether fluency takes effect above and beyond the effects of item difficulty. We therefore tested whether encoding fluency still affects JOLs when numerous additional cues indicating the difficulty of an item are available as well. In three experiments, participants made JOLs for another participant while observing his or her self-paced study phase. However, study times were swapped in one experimental condition, so that items with short study times (indicating high fluency) were presented for long durations, whereas items with long study times (indicating low fluency) were presented for short durations. Results showed that both item difficulty and encoding fluency affected JOLs. Thus, encoding fluency in itself is indeed an important cue for JOLs that does not become redundant when difficulty information is available in addition. This observation lends considerable support to the ease-of-processing hypothesis.

摘要

信息编码的流畅性经常被作为学习判断(JOLs)所表明的预测记忆表现的一个主要决定因素来讨论。以往的研究确立了编码流畅性对学习判断的影响。然而,在项目难度的影响之外流畅性是否起作用在很大程度上尚不清楚。因此,我们测试了在有许多表明项目难度的额外线索时,编码流畅性是否仍然会影响学习判断。在三个实验中,参与者在观察另一名参与者的自定进度学习阶段时对其学习判断。然而,在一种实验条件下学习时间被调换了,这样学习时间短(表明高流畅性)的项目呈现时间长,而学习时间长(表明低流畅性)的项目呈现时间短。结果表明项目难度和编码流畅性都影响学习判断。因此,编码流畅性本身确实是学习判断的一个重要线索,当有难度信息时它不会变得多余。这一观察结果为加工流畅性假说提供了相当大的支持。

相似文献

1
Separation of encoding fluency and item difficulty effects on judgements of learning.编码流畅性与项目难度对学习判断的影响分离
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(10):2060-72. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.777751. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
2
Judgments of learning reflect encoding fluency: conclusive evidence for the ease-of-processing hypothesis.学习判断反映了编码流畅性:对加工容易性假说的有力证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Sep;37(5):1264-9. doi: 10.1037/a0023719.
3
Perceptual fluency, auditory generation, and metamemory: analyzing the perceptual fluency hypothesis in the auditory modality.知觉流畅性、听觉生成和记忆预测:听觉模态中对知觉流畅性假说的分析。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Mar;40(2):429-40. doi: 10.1037/a0034407. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
4
The effect of identical word pairs on people's metamemory judgments: What are the contributions of processing fluency and beliefs about memory?相同词对在人们元记忆判断上的作用:加工流畅性和记忆信念的作用是什么?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(4):781-99. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1058404. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
5
More than just beliefs: Experience and beliefs jointly contribute to volume effects on metacognitive judgments.不仅仅是信念:经验和信念共同影响元认知判断的量值效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 May;43(5):680-693. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000332. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
6
The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: evidence for agenda-based monitoring.价值与关联性的相互作用作为元认知监测和控制的基础:基于议程的监测的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Sep;37(5):1236-42. doi: 10.1037/a0023548.
7
Measuring memory monitoring with judgements of retention (JORs).通过记忆保持判断(JORs)来测量记忆监控。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(7):1376-96. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.656665. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
8
Cue integration in metamemory judgements is strategic.元记忆判断中的线索整合是具有策略性的。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Apr;73(4):629-642. doi: 10.1177/1747021819882308. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
9
Illusions of competence for phonetically, orthographically, and semantically similar word pairs.在语音、拼写和语义相似的单词对方面的能力错觉。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2009 Dec;63(4):294-302. doi: 10.1037/a0015717.
10
Distinctive items are salient during encoding: delayed judgements of learning predict the isolation effect.独特的项目在编码过程中很突出:学习的延迟判断能预测隔离效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Jan;63(1):50-64. doi: 10.1080/17470210902790161. Epub 2009 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Judgments of Difficulty (JODs) While Observing an Automated System Support the Media Equation and Unique Agent Hypotheses.观察自动化系统时的难度判断(JODs)支持媒体等式和独特代理假设。
Hum Factors. 2025 Apr;67(4):347-366. doi: 10.1177/00187208241273379. Epub 2024 Aug 18.
2
I remember it now, so I'll remember it later: Working memory strength guides predictions for long-term memory performance.我现在想起来了,以后也会记得:工作记忆强度指导对长期记忆表现的预测。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Nov;52(8):1775-1797. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01514-3. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
3
Cooking through perceptual disfluencies: The effects of auditory and visual distortions on predicted and actual memory performance.
通过感知不流畅来烹饪:听觉和视觉扭曲对预测和实际记忆表现的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2023 May;51(4):862-874. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01370-7. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
4
High fluency can improve recognition sensitivity based on learned metacognitive expectations.高流畅性可以基于习得的元认知期望提高识别敏感性。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 20;13:958511. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.958511. eCollection 2022.
5
Judgements of effort as a function of post-trial versus post-task elicitation.作为试验后与任务后引出的努力判断的函数。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Jun;74(6):991-1006. doi: 10.1177/17470218211005759. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
6
Memory and metamemory for social interactions: Evidence for a metamemory expectancy illusion.社会互动的记忆和元记忆:元记忆期望错觉的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Jan;49(1):14-31. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01071-z.
7
Speed Effect Analysis Using the CFA Framework.使用CFA框架的速度效应分析。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 14;10:239. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00239. eCollection 2019.
8
How font size affects judgments of learning: Simultaneous mediating effect of item-specific beliefs about fluency and moderating effect of beliefs about font size and memory.字号如何影响学习判断:流畅性的项目特定信念的同时中介作用和字号与记忆信念的调节作用。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 20;13(7):e0200888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200888. eCollection 2018.
9
How often are thoughts metacognitive? Findings from research on self-regulated learning, think-aloud protocols, and mind-wandering.元认知思维出现的频率是多少?自我调节学习、出声思维和思维漫游研究的发现。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug;25(4):1269-1286. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1490-1.
10
Simultaneous utilization of multiple cues in judgments of learning.学习判断中多种线索的同时利用。
Mem Cognit. 2018 May;46(4):507-519. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0780-6.