Shigenaga Y, Mitsuhiro Y, Shirana Y, Tsuru H
Department of Oral Anatomy, Hiroshima University School of Dentistry, Japan.
Brain Res. 1990 Apr 30;514(2):219-37. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(90)91418-g.
Intra-axonal records and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) injection techniques were employed to define the response properties of the jaw-closing muscle spindle afferents in the trigeminal mesencephalic nucleus (Vmes) and their morphological characteristics. The axonal trajectories of 9 spindle afferents from the masseter and 4 afferents from the temporalis were recovered for detailed analyses. Of 13 afferents, 6 cell bodies were stained and they were located at the rostrocaudal mid-levels of the Vmes. The central courses of the stem fibers were organized in a similar manner to the Vmes periodontal afferent nerves with the exception that peripheral (P) fibers of all spindle afferents passed through the trigeminal motor tract and root. On the basis of collateral terminal arborizations, the Vmes spindle afferents could be classified into two types: type I (n = 6) and type II (n = 7). Type I afferents sent their collaterals into the trigeminal motor nucleus (Vmo), intertrigeminal region (Vint) and juxtatrigeminal region (Vjux), but collaterals from the two neurons also projected to Vmes and the nucleus oralis (Vo). The collaterals from type II afferents formed their terminal arbors in the supratrigeminal nucleus (Vsup) in addition to the Vmo, Vint and Vjux, but collaterals from one neuron also projected to the Vo. In type I afferents, terminal arbors encompassed the whole Vmo including jaw-closing motoneurons. In contrast, boutons from type II afferents were restricted to a few small portions within the Vmo in proximity to its lateral and dorsal boundaries. The diameters of the united (U), central (C) and peripheral (P), fibers were larger in type I than type II afferents; those of the U fibers were statistically significant. Any differences between the two distinct types were not found in the response pattern to the sustained jaw opening. These results suggest that the difference of primary and secondary muscle-spindle afferent nerves is reflected in a distinctive morphology in the terminal arborizations and in the diameters of united fibers rather than the response patterns in deeply anesthetized cats.
采用轴突内记录和辣根过氧化物酶(HRP)注射技术来确定三叉神经中脑核(Vmes)中闭口肌梭传入纤维的反应特性及其形态特征。对来自咬肌的9条梭传入纤维和来自颞肌的4条传入纤维的轴突轨迹进行了恢复,以便进行详细分析。在13条传入纤维中,6个细胞体被染色,它们位于Vmes的 rostrocaudal 中间水平。主干纤维的中央走行与Vmes牙周传入神经的组织方式相似,不同之处在于所有梭传入纤维的外周(P)纤维穿过三叉神经运动束和神经根。根据侧支终末分支,Vmes梭传入纤维可分为两种类型:I型(n = 6)和II型(n = 7)。I型传入纤维将其侧支发送到三叉神经运动核(Vmo)、三叉神经间区(Vint)和三叉神经旁区(Vjux),但这两个神经元的侧支也投射到Vmes和口核(Vo)。II型传入纤维的侧支除了在Vmo、Vint和Vjux形成终末分支外,还在三叉神经上核(Vsup)形成终末分支,但一个神经元的侧支也投射到Vo。在I型传入纤维中,终末分支包围了整个Vmo,包括闭口运动神经元。相比之下,II型传入纤维的终扣局限于Vmo内靠近其外侧和背侧边界的几个小部分。I型传入纤维的联合(U)、中央(C)和外周(P)纤维的直径大于II型传入纤维;U纤维的直径具有统计学意义。在对持续张口的反应模式中未发现这两种不同类型之间的任何差异。这些结果表明,在深度麻醉的猫中,初级和次级肌梭传入神经的差异反映在终末分支的独特形态和联合纤维的直径上,而不是反应模式上。