Naccarella Lucio, Greenstock Louise, Wraight Brenda
Australian Health Workforce Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Aust Health Rev. 2013 May;37(2):251-5. doi: 10.1071/AH12183.
To ensure New Zealand's health workforce was fit for purpose, Health Workforce New Zealand (HWNZ) funded Workforce Service Reviews (WSRs) to develop visions for service reconfiguration and workforce for 2020. This paper describes what makes the WSR processes work, for whom, and in what circumstances.
Semi-structured interviews informed by a realist evaluation approach were conducted to obtain perceptions and experiences of WSR participants from four WSRs: eye health, palliative care, anaesthesia and aged care.
The WSR process was a successful means of bringing together professionals from across the health disciplines and building sector capacity to develop new ways of thinking about service and workforce planning. WSRs were constrained by: mixed signals about process and outcomes; being challenged not milestone focussed; lacking clarity about ownership of visions; and variable clarity about next steps. WSRs were optimised by having: a lead clinician with policy know-how, ability to inspire, bring people together, distil ideas into coherent frameworks; and a project manager with project enablement skill sets and expertise in complex systems, implementation, change management.
Evidence now exists at a point in time about what makes the WSR processes work. Implications for HWNZ are presented using a capacity-building framework to inform future decision making regarding WSRs. WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THE TOPIC? More appropriate workforce planning is required to meet the challenges facing the health workforce, from both the demand and the workforce side. To ensure New Zealand's healthcare workforce was fit for purpose, HWNZ initiated an iterative WSR process in topic specific areas. The WSRs process was designed to develop a vision of the relevant health service and workforce for 2020, and models of care that were patient-centred and team-based. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER ADD? The paper provides evidence that the WSR process was a successful means for bringing together professionals from across the health disciplines and building sector capacity to develop new ways of thinking about service and workforce planning. The paper presents key enablers of, and barriers to, the WSR iterative process. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTITIONERS? The evaluation revealed that a multitude of factors can influence the capacity of the WSR process at the individual (workforce skills and abilities), organisational (leadership and interactions) and systems (infrastructure) levels. Implications for HWNZ on ways to build the capacity of the WSRs according to three capacity-building dimensions are presented to inform future decision making.
为确保新西兰的卫生人力队伍符合目标要求,新西兰卫生人力部门(HWNZ)资助了劳动力服务审查(WSR),以制定2020年服务重新配置和劳动力的愿景。本文描述了WSR流程在何种情况下、对谁以及如何发挥作用。
采用现实主义评估方法进行半结构化访谈,以获取来自四个WSR(眼科保健、姑息治疗、麻醉和老年护理)参与者的看法和经验。
WSR流程是一种成功的方式,能够汇聚各卫生学科的专业人员并建设部门能力,以形成关于服务和劳动力规划的新思维方式。WSR受到以下因素的制约:关于流程和结果的信号不一;受到质疑,未聚焦于里程碑;愿景的所有权不明确;后续步骤的清晰度不一。通过具备以下条件可优化WSR:一位具备政策知识、有激励能力、能凝聚人员并将想法提炼成连贯框架的首席临床医生;以及一位具备项目促成技能和复杂系统、实施、变革管理专业知识的项目经理。
目前有关于WSR流程如何发挥作用的证据。利用能力建设框架阐述了对HWNZ的启示,为未来关于WSR的决策提供参考。关于该主题已知的情况是什么?需要进行更合适的劳动力规划,以应对卫生人力队伍在需求和劳动力方面面临的挑战。为确保新西兰的医疗劳动力队伍符合目标要求,HWNZ在特定主题领域启动了迭代式WSR流程。WSR流程旨在制定2020年相关卫生服务和劳动力的愿景,以及以患者为中心和基于团队的护理模式。本文补充了什么内容?本文提供证据表明,WSR流程是汇聚各卫生学科专业人员并建设部门能力以形成服务和劳动力规划新思维方式的成功手段。本文呈现了WSR迭代流程的关键促成因素和障碍。对从业者有何启示?评估表明,众多因素会在个人(劳动力技能和能力)、组织(领导力和互动)和系统(基础设施)层面影响WSR流程的能力。根据三个能力建设维度,阐述了对HWNZ在如何建设WSR能力方面的启示,为未来决策提供参考。