Department of Comprehensive Care, School of Dental Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, 2124 Cornell Rd., Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
J Dent Educ. 2013 Apr;77(4):438-47.
Caries development is determined by a balance of protective and pathological factors, so the clinician should be able to identify and document those factors, understand their relative weight in disease development or reversal, and make recommendations to patients that will lead to risk reduction. The caries management by risk assessment (CAMBRA) protocol frames these factors into an easy-to-follow template that also guides the clinician in making recommendations. The purposes of this study were to examine implementation of the CAMBRA-based risk assessment program in a predoctoral clinic at one dental school, assess the accuracy of caries risk evaluation by the students, and evaluate the utilization of professionally applied fluoride varnish in a moderate- and high-risk patient cohort. After dental clinic patients were screened for previous caries risk status, sixty-eight moderate- or high-risk patients were invited to participate in the study. At the study visit that included four bite-wing radiographs, a new caries risk assessment (CRA) form was completed. Our results showed that students underestimated the risk in 25 percent of the cases; the underestimation occurred especially when visible cavitation or caries into dentin by radiograph was the only risk factor or when caries were not identified at the initial visit when the CRA form was completed for the first time despite the presence of other high-risk factors. Students also underestimated both risk and protective factors at the initial evaluation visit compared with the study visit. The results show that students were not rigorous enough in documenting these factors and determining the patient's risk. In order to increase the sensitivity of risk assessment, training and recalibration for students and faculty members should be an ongoing process.
龋病的发展取决于保护因素和致病因素之间的平衡,因此临床医生应能够识别和记录这些因素,了解它们在疾病发展或逆转中的相对权重,并向患者提出建议以降低风险。龋病风险评估管理(CAMBRA)方案将这些因素纳入一个易于遵循的模板中,同时指导临床医生提出建议。本研究的目的是检查一个牙科学校的研究生诊所中 CAMBRA 风险评估方案的实施情况,评估学生进行龋病风险评估的准确性,并评估中度和高度风险患者群体中专业应用氟化物漆的使用情况。在对牙科诊所患者进行既往龋病风险状况筛查后,邀请 68 名中度或高度风险患者参加研究。在包括四张咬翼片的研究就诊时,完成了新的龋病风险评估(CRA)表。我们的结果表明,学生在 25%的病例中低估了风险;这种低估尤其发生在只有可见的空洞或放射片中的牙本质龋作为唯一的风险因素时,或者在首次就诊时尽管存在其他高风险因素,但首次填写 CRA 表时并未发现龋病时。学生在初始评估就诊时也低估了风险和保护因素。结果表明,学生在记录这些因素和确定患者风险方面不够严格。为了提高风险评估的敏感性,对学生和教师进行培训和重新校准应该是一个持续的过程。