Suppr超能文献

生物燃料/生物油副产物(卡诺拉粕)与油菜籽粕的化学成分、能量值和蛋白质分子结构特征比较。

Chemical profile, energy values, and protein molecular structure characteristics of biofuel/bio-oil co-products (carinata meal) in comparison with canola meal.

机构信息

Department of Animal and Poultry Science, College of Agricultural and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan , 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A8, Canada.

出版信息

J Agric Food Chem. 2013 Apr 24;61(16):3926-33. doi: 10.1021/jf400028n. Epub 2013 Apr 15.

Abstract

To our knowledge, little information exists on nutritive values and molecular structural characteristics associated with protein biopolymers of carinata meal from biofuel and bio-oil processing. The objectives of this study were to investigate (1) chemical compositions; (2) protein and carbohydrate subfractions partitioned by the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS); (3) truly digestible nutrients and energy values; (4) protein conformation spectral characteristics using the ATR-FT/IR technique; and (5) the correlation between protein intrinsic structural features and nutrient profiles of carinata meal in comparison with conventional canola meal as references. The results showed that carinata meal was higher (p < 0.05) in soluble crude protein (SCP, 55.6% CP) and nonprotein nitrogen (NPN, 38.5% CP) and lower in acid detergent insoluble crude protein (ADICP, 1.3% CP) compared to canola meal. Although no differences were found in CP and carbohydrate (CHO) contents, CNCPS protein and carbohydrate subfractions were different (p < 0.05) between carinata meal and canola meal. Carinata meal has similar contents of total digestible nutrient (TDN) and predicted energy values to canoal meal (p > 0.05). As for protein spectral features, much greater IR absorbance in amide I height and area as well as α-helix and β-sheet height for carinata meal by 20-31% (p < 0.05) was found compared with canola meal; however, results from agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis (CLA) and principal component analysis (PCA) indicated these two meals could not be distinguished completely within the protein spectrum (ca. 1728-1478 cm(-1)). Additionally, close correlations were observed between protein structural parameters and protein nutrient profiles and subfractions. All the comparisons between carinata meal and canola meal in our study indicated that carinata meal could be used as a potential high-protein supplement source for ruminants. Further study is needed on more information associated with nutrient degradability, utilization, and availability of carinata meal to ruminants for its better and effective application in animal industry.

摘要

据我们所知,关于生物燃料和生物油加工过程中羽扇豆粕的营养价值和与其相关的蛋白质生物聚合物的分子结构特性的信息很少。本研究的目的是调查:(1)化学成分;(2)康奈尔净碳水化合物和蛋白质系统(CNCPS)划分的蛋白质和碳水化合物亚组分;(3)真正可消化的营养物质和能量值;(4)使用衰减全反射傅里叶变换/红外(ATR-FT/IR)技术的蛋白质构象光谱特征;(5)与常规油菜粕相比,羽扇豆粕的蛋白质固有结构特征与营养特性之间的相关性。结果表明,与油菜粕相比,羽扇豆粕的可溶性粗蛋白(SCP,55.6% CP)和非蛋白氮(NPN,38.5% CP)更高(p<0.05),而酸洗涤剂不溶粗蛋白(ADICP,1.3% CP)更低。尽管羽扇豆粕和油菜粕的粗蛋白(CP)和碳水化合物(CHO)含量没有差异,但 CNCPS 蛋白质和碳水化合物亚组分不同(p<0.05)。羽扇豆粕的总可消化养分(TDN)和预测能量值与油菜粕相似(p>0.05)。就蛋白质光谱特征而言,与油菜粕相比,羽扇豆粕的酰胺 I 高度和面积以及α-螺旋和β-折叠高度的 IR 吸光度高 20-31%(p<0.05);然而,凝聚层次聚类分析(CLA)和主成分分析(PCA)的结果表明,这两种饲料在蛋白质光谱(约 1728-1478 cm(-1))内无法完全区分。此外,还观察到蛋白质结构参数与蛋白质营养特性和亚组分之间存在密切的相关性。本研究中羽扇豆粕与油菜粕的所有比较均表明,羽扇豆粕可作为反刍动物潜在的高蛋白补充来源。需要进一步研究羽扇豆粕在反刍动物中的养分降解率、利用率和可用性等更多信息,以便在动物产业中更好、更有效地应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验