Sindberg Diana, Nissen Sofie, Anh Nguyen Thi Lan, Johansen Maria Vang
Section for Parasitology and Aquatic Diseases, Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 57, DK-1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Vet Parasitol. 2013 Jul 1;195(1-2):192-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.03.016. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
The study was conducted to evaluate copro-diagnostic techniques for detection of small trematode eggs in dogs. FLOTAC, a novel flotation technique, and DBL, a sieving and sedimentation technique developed at the former Danish Bilharziasis Laboratory (DBL), were compared using 53 subsamples from four copro-positive dogs. Moreover, a modified version of the DBL technique and the Kato-Katz (KK) thick smear were later compared using faecal samples from 21 dogs. The four techniques were pair-wise compared regarding sensitivity, infection intensity and practical applicability. For the former two techniques, egg recovery subsequent to storage and reproducibility were also compared. The DBL technique detected all 53 subsamples positive for small trematode eggs. Based on 17 subsamples, mean infection intensity of 47±49 eggs per gram of faeces (EPG) was detected by the technique. Due to large amount of sediment, examination of a single subsample required an average of 3 hours. The FLOTAC technique was found less sensitive (82%) than the DBL technique and recovered significantly less eggs (4±6 EPG). Both sensitivity and intensity were further reduced following storage. As the FLOTAC technique requires specialised equipment, safety disposal and personal protective equipment, it was found less suited than the DBL technique for a basic laboratory. Additionally, poor reproducibilities were found for both the DBL and FLOTAC techniques (30±15% and 38±33%, respectively). Based on the 21 faecal samples, the modified version of the DBL technique was found more sensitive (85%) than the KK technique (68%), whereas egg counts were significantly higher for the latter (23±26 EPG vs. 482±909 EPG). By modifying the DBL technique, it was possible to diminish the retained sediment and examination time to a maximum of an hour, which was also the time required by the KK technique, although the latter was faster and more easily processed. Based on the results obtained in this study, none of the techniques evaluated were found applicable in their current form for detection of small trematode eggs in faeces from dogs in Vietnam.
本研究旨在评估检测犬类小型吸虫卵的粪便诊断技术。使用来自4只粪便检测呈阳性犬的53个亚样本,对新型浮选技术FLOTAC和前丹麦血吸虫病实验室(DBL)开发的筛分与沉降技术DBL进行了比较。此外,后来使用21只犬的粪便样本,对DBL技术的改良版本与加藤-厚涂片法(KK)进行了比较。对这四种技术在敏感性、感染强度和实际适用性方面进行了两两比较。对于前两种技术,还比较了储存后的虫卵回收率和重复性。DBL技术检测出所有53个小型吸虫卵呈阳性的亚样本。基于17个亚样本,该技术检测出每克粪便(EPG)的平均感染强度为47±49个虫卵。由于沉淀物量很大,检查单个亚样本平均需要3小时。发现FLOTAC技术比DBL技术敏感性更低(82%),回收的虫卵显著更少(4±6 EPG)。储存后,敏感性和强度均进一步降低。由于FLOTAC技术需要专门设备、安全处置和个人防护装备,发现它比DBL技术更不适合基础实验室。此外,发现DBL和FLOTAC技术的重复性都很差(分别为30±15%和38±33%)。基于21份粪便样本,发现DBL技术的改良版本比KK技术更敏感(85%对68%),而后者的虫卵计数显著更高(23±26 EPG对482±909 EPG)。通过改良DBL技术,可以将残留沉淀物和检查时间减少到最多1小时,这也是KK技术所需的时间,尽管KK技术更快且更容易操作。基于本研究获得的结果,所评估的技术目前均不适用于检测越南犬类粪便中的小型吸虫卵。