Hocaoğlu Emre, Kuvat Samet Vasfi, Özalp Burhan, Akhmedov Anvar, Doğan Yunus, Kozanoğlu Erol, Mete Fethi Sarper, Erer Metin
Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, İstanbul University, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013 Jan;19(1):58-64. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2013.04453.
Despite significant practical knowledge and experience on foreign body penetration injuries to the hand and/or wrist, deficient management and complications can still be encountered, and ignorance of its causative and eventual social aspects unfortunately is a substantial fact. This study aims to cover the clinical and social properties and the management of these kinds of injuries.
A retrospective analysis of 86 patients requiring evaluation and treatment in a Hand Surgery Division of a university hospital was performed.
The median age was 32 (min: 4, max: 63). Industrial workers constituted the largest occupational group (n=22, 25.6%). Twenty-three (26.7%) of the cases were elective admissions. Thirteen (15.1%) patients had various comorbidities, and five (5.8%) had psychiatric diagnoses at the time of the injury. The index finger was the most frequent site of injury (n=29, 33.7%). General anesthesia was not necessary for the management of 94.2% of the cases. In 26 (30%) of the patients, neural, tendinous or osseous damage was observed. Twenty-four (30%) patients were included in a postoperative hand physiotherapy program.
The practically well-known general features of the issue and those aspects that may still be overlooked currently are reevaluated herein, in light of our observational data.