Maharjan Shyam Krishna
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive care, Kathmandu medical college, Kathmandu, Nepal.
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2013 Jan-Mar;52(189):255-9.
I-gel is a relatively new supra-glotitc airway device which is claimed to be superior to laryngeal mask airway. It can be used ingeneral anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation as well as with positive pressure ventilation.This study was designed to assess whether I-gel creates adequate laryngeal seal during positive pressure ventilation in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.
A prospective randomized study was made among the 60 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Airway was managed with either I-gel insertion or endotracheal intubation and positive pressure ventilation in 30 patients each. Airway pressure, end-tidal CO2and oxygen saturation were monitored and compared between two groups. Inhaled and exhaled tidal volume, minute volume were recorded and leak volume and leak fraction was calculated and compared between two groups.
Oxygenation and ventilation (oxygen saturation and end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure) was within normal limit in both groups and comparable. Leak volume in tracheal tube group was 25.33±12.41 ml and in I-gel group it was 26.43±13.19 ml. Leak fraction was 0.0487±0.023 and 0.0417±0.022 in tracheal group and I-gel group respectively. The airway pressure during C02 pneumoperitoneumwas 20.55±3.25 cm H20 in tracheal tube group and 20.21± 3.97 cm H20 in I-gel group and there was no significant leak in either group. Statistically, there was no significant difference in leak volume, leak fraction and airway pressure between the two groups.
I- gel may be an alternate to tracheal tube during general anesthesia with positive pressure ventilation in patients with normal airway pressure with acceptable leak, adequate oxygenation and ventilation.
I-gel是一种相对较新的声门上气道装置,据称优于喉罩气道。它可用于自主通气的全身麻醉以及正压通气。本研究旨在评估在接受腹腔镜手术的患者进行正压通气期间,I-gel是否能形成足够的喉密封。
对60例在全身麻醉下接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者进行前瞻性随机研究。30例患者通过插入I-gel进行气道管理,另外30例患者通过气管插管并进行正压通气。监测并比较两组的气道压力、呼气末二氧化碳分压和氧饱和度。记录吸入和呼出潮气量、分钟通气量,并计算漏气量和漏气分数,比较两组结果。
两组的氧合和通气(氧饱和度和呼气末二氧化碳分压)均在正常范围内且具有可比性。气管插管组的漏气量为25.33±12.41 ml,I-gel组为26.43±13.19 ml。气管插管组和I-gel组的漏气分数分别为0.0487±0.023和0.0417±0.022。二氧化碳气腹期间气管插管组的气道压力为20.55±3.25 cm H₂O,I-gel组为20.21±3.97 cm H₂O,两组均无明显漏气。统计学上,两组之间的漏气量、漏气分数和气道压力无显著差异。
对于气道压力正常、漏气可接受、氧合和通气充分的患者,在全身麻醉正压通气期间,I-gel可能是气管插管的替代选择。