Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜手术患者声门上气道装置与气管内导管的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparison between supraglottic airway devices and endotracheal tubes in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Park Sun Kyung, Ko Geum, Choi Geun Joo, Ahn Eun Jin, Kang Hyun

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine Medical Course, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju National University, Jeju Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(33):e4598. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004598.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Comparisons between the efficacies of supraglottic airway devices (SGAs) and endotracheal tubes (ETTs) in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries have yielded conflicting results. Therefore, in this meta-analysis, we compared the clinical performance and incidence of complications between SGAs and ETT intubation in laparoscopic surgery.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar to identify randomized controlled trials that compared SGAs with ETTs in laparoscopic surgery.

RESULTS

In total, 1433 patients from 17 studies were included in the final analysis. SGAs and ETTs showed no difference in insertion success rate on the first attempt (relative risk [RR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-1.03), insertion time (standardized mean difference 1.57, 95% CI -3.74 to 0.61), and oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) (mean difference -2.54, 95% CI -7.59 to 2.50). The incidence of desaturation (RR 3.65, 95% CI 1.39-9.62), gastric insufflations (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.48-1.71), regurgitation (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.02-49.13), and aspiration (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.01-78.4) also showed no intergroup differences. However, the incidence of laryngospasm (RR 3.12, 95% CI 1.29-7.52), cough at removal (RR 6.68, 95% CI 4.70-9.48), dysphagia (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.12-1.95) or dysphonia (RR 4.41, 95% CI 1.25-15.55), sore throat (RR 1.60, 95% CI 1.33-1.93), and hoarseness (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.29-1.81) was higher in the ETT group than in the SGA group.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of laryngospasm, cough at removal, dysphagia or dysphonia, sore throat, and hoarseness were higher in the ETT group than in the SGA group. However, the groups showed no differences in the rate of insertion success on the first attempt, insertion time, OLP, and other complications. Therefore, SGAs might be clinically more useful as effective airways in laparoscopic surgery.

摘要

背景

在接受腹腔镜手术的患者中,声门上气道装置(SGA)与气管内插管(ETT)的疗效比较结果相互矛盾。因此,在这项荟萃分析中,我们比较了SGA和ETT在腹腔镜手术中的临床表现及并发症发生率。

方法

通过检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库和谷歌学术进行全面搜索,以确定在腹腔镜手术中比较SGA与ETT的随机对照试验。

结果

最终分析共纳入了来自17项研究的1433例患者。SGA和ETT在首次插入成功率(相对危险度[RR]1.01,95%置信区间[CI]0.99 - 1.03)、插入时间(标准化均差1.57,95%CI - 3.74至0.61)和口咽漏气压(OLP)(均差 - 2.54,95%CI - 7.59至2.50)方面无差异。去饱和发生率(RR 3.65,95%CI 1.39 - 9.62)、胃充气(RR 0.90,95%CI 0.48 - 1.71)、反流(RR 0.98,95%CI 0.02 - 49.13)和误吸(RR 0.99,95%CI 0.01 - 78.4)在组间也无差异。然而,ETT组的喉痉挛发生率(RR 3.12,95%CI 1.29 - 7.52)、拔除时咳嗽发生率(RR 6.68,95%CI 4.70 - 9.48)、吞咽困难发生率(RR 1.47,95%CI 1.12 - 1.95)或声音嘶哑发生率(RR 4.41,95%CI 1.25 - 15.55)、咽痛发生率(RR 1.60,95%CI 1.33 - 1.93)和声音嘶哑发生率(RR 1.53,95%CI 1.29 - 1.81)均高于SGA组。

结论

ETT组的喉痉挛、拔除时咳嗽、吞咽困难或声音嘶哑、咽痛和声音嘶哑的发生率高于SGA组。然而,两组在首次插入成功率、插入时间、OLP和其他并发症发生率方面无差异。因此,在腹腔镜手术中,SGA作为有效的气道可能在临床上更有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d7a/5370819/0452b22ddb4e/medi-95-e4598-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验