Thombre Vivek, Koudale Somnath B, Bhongade Manohar L
Department of Periodontology and Implantology, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed University), Maharashtra, India.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013 May-Jun;33(3):e88-94. doi: 10.11607/prd.1371.
Gingival recession remains an important problem in dental esthetics. Various surgical techniques have been proposed for treating multiple gingival recessions. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of a coronally positioned flap (CPF) with or without acellular dermal matrix allograft (ADMA) in the treatment of multiple marginal tissue recession. Twenty patients with a mean age of 31.6 years presented with 43 buccal/labial multiple recession defects (Miller Class I/II). Ten patients each were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: group 1 (ADMA) or group 2 (CPF). The clinical parameters gingival recession (GR), probing pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and width of the keratinized gingiva (KG) were recorded before surgery and 6 month postsurgery. The mean baseline recession defect was 3.0 mm for group 1 and 2.8 mm for group 2. After 6 months, both treatments resulted in significant root coverage (P < .01), reaching an average of 2.7 mm (90%) in group 1 and 1.8 mm (66%) in group 2. The difference in recession reduction between treatments was statistically significant. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatments in PD and KG. CAL gain (3.0 mm) was significantly higher in group 1 compared with group 2 (2.0 mm). The results of this study demonstrate that ADMA with a CPF is an effective procedure for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions.
牙龈退缩仍然是口腔美学中的一个重要问题。人们已经提出了各种外科技术来治疗多处牙龈退缩。本研究的目的是评估和比较带或不带脱细胞真皮基质同种异体移植物(ADMA)的冠向复位瓣(CPF)在治疗多处边缘组织退缩中的有效性。20例平均年龄为31.6岁的患者出现43处颊侧/唇侧多处退缩缺损(Miller I/II类)。将10例患者随机分为两个治疗组之一:第1组(ADMA)或第2组(CPF)。在手术前和术后6个月记录临床参数牙龈退缩(GR)、探诊深度(PD)、临床附着水平(CAL)和角化龈宽度(KG)。第1组平均基线退缩缺损为3.0mm,第2组为2.8mm。6个月后,两种治疗均导致显著的牙根覆盖(P <.01),第1组平均达到2.7mm(90%),第2组达到1.8mm(66%)。治疗之间退缩减少的差异具有统计学意义。治疗组之间在PD和KG方面无统计学显著差异。第1组的CAL增加(3.0mm)显著高于第2组(2.0mm)。本研究结果表明,CPF联合ADMA是治疗多处牙龈退缩的有效方法。