Suppr超能文献

随机安慰剂对照试验评估普萘洛尔在哮喘中的慢性给药效应。

Randomized placebo-controlled trial to evaluate chronic dosing effects of propranolol in asthma.

机构信息

Asthma and Allergy Research Group, Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Jun 15;187(12):1308-14. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201212-2206OC.

Abstract

RATIONALE

Unblinded studies have shown improvements in airway hyperresponsiveness with chronic nadolol in steroid-naive patients with asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of chronic nonselective β-blockade as add-on to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in patients with asthma.

METHODS

A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover trial of propranolol in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma receiving ICS was performed. Participants underwent a 6- to 8-week dose titration of propranolol or placebo as tolerated to a maximum of 80 mg per day. Tiotropium was given for the first 4 to 6 weeks of each treatment period.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Primary outcome was methacholine challenge. Secondary outcomes included histamine challenge, pulmonary function, mini-asthma quality of life questionnaire (mini-AQLQ), and asthma control questionnaire (ACQ). Eighteen patients completed (mean [SEM]): age, 36 (4) yr; FEV1%, 93 (2); ICS, 440 (66) μg/d. No significant difference was observed in methacholine or histamine challenge after exposure to propranolol versus placebo. For methacholine challenge, the doubling dilution difference was 0.04 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.56 to 0.63), P = 0.89. Albuterol recovery at 20 minutes after histamine challenge was partially attenuated by propranolol versus placebo: FEV1% mean difference, 5.28 (95% CI, 2.54-8.01), P = 0.001. After chronic β-blockade there was a small worsening in FEV1 % predicted of 2.4% (95% CI, -0.1 to 4.8), P = 0.055. No difference was found for ACQ or mini-AQLQ.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first placebo-controlled study to assess the effects of chronic nonselective β-blockade in asthma, showing no significant effect of propranolol compared with placebo on either methacholine or histamine airway hyperresponsiveness and no change in ACQ or AQLQ. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01074853).

摘要

背景

非盲研究表明,在哮喘的类固醇初治患者中,慢性纳多洛尔可改善气道高反应性。

目的

评估慢性非选择性β受体阻滞剂作为哮喘患者吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)的附加治疗的效果。

方法

对接受 ICS 治疗的轻中度哮喘患者进行了普萘洛尔双盲随机安慰剂对照交叉试验。参与者耐受地接受 6-8 周的普萘洛尔或安慰剂滴定,最大剂量为每天 80mg。在每个治疗期的前 4-6 周给予噻托溴铵。

测量和主要结果

主要结局是乙酰甲胆碱挑战。次要结局包括组织胺挑战、肺功能、迷你哮喘生活质量问卷(mini-AQLQ)和哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)。18 名患者完成了研究(平均值[SEM]):年龄,36(4)岁;FEV1%,93(2);ICS,440(66)μg/d。与安慰剂相比,普萘洛尔暴露后乙酰甲胆碱或组织胺挑战无显著差异。对于乙酰甲胆碱挑战,倍增稀释差异为 0.04(95%置信区间[CI],-0.56 至 0.63),P=0.89。与安慰剂相比,普萘洛尔部分减弱了组织胺挑战后 20 分钟时沙丁胺醇的恢复:FEV1%平均差异为 5.28(95%CI,2.54-8.01),P=0.001。在慢性β受体阻断后,FEV1%预计值略有恶化,为 2.4%(95%CI,-0.1 至 4.8),P=0.055。ACQ 或 mini-AQLQ 无差异。

结论

这是第一项评估哮喘中慢性非选择性β受体阻滞剂作用的安慰剂对照研究,与安慰剂相比,普萘洛尔对乙酰甲胆碱或组织胺气道高反应性无显著影响,ACQ 或 AQLQ 无变化。临床试验在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 注册(NCT01074853)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验