Department of Endocrinology and Unit for Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium,
Osteoporos Int. 2013 Oct;24(10):2561-9. doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2341-6. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
The relationship between baseline Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) and treatment efficacy was evaluated using data from a pivotal phase 3 study. Relative risk of vertebral, nonvertebral, and all clinical fractures decreased with increasing probability of fracture for bazedoxifene (BZA) versus placebo but remained generally constant for raloxifene (RLX).
To determine whether the FRAX® predicts osteoporosis treatment efficacy, we evaluated reductions in fracture incidence associated with BZA and RLX according to baseline fracture risk determined by FRAX® using data from a phase 3 osteoporosis treatment study.
Hazard ratios (HRs) for effects of BZA and RLX versus placebo on incidence of vertebral, nonvertebral, and all clinical fractures were calculated using a Cox regression model. Cox regression analyses were performed in subgroups at or above 10-year fracture probability thresholds determined by FRAX®.
HRs for the risk of vertebral, nonvertebral, and all clinical fractures versus placebo decreased with increasing 10-year fracture probability for BZA, while those for RLX remained stable. In all 10-year fracture probability subgroups, all BZA doses significantly reduced vertebral fracture risk versus placebo (HR = 0.22-0.66). BZA at 20, 40, and 20/40 mg significantly reduced risk of nonvertebral fractures (HR = 0.45, 0.44, and 0.45, respectively) and all clinical fractures (HR = 0.38, 0.41, and 0.40, respectively) for ≥20.0 % fracture probability. Vertebral fracture risk reductions for RLX 60 mg versus placebo were significant in subgroups at lower fracture probabilities (≥2.5- ≥ 10.0 %), but not higher (≥12.5 %), and in no subgroups for nonvertebral or all clinical fractures.
The antifracture efficacy of BZA increased with increasing baseline FRAX® score, but there was no clear relationship between RLX and baseline FRAX®. These findings provide independent confirmation of current literature, suggesting that the relationship between FRAX® and treatment efficacy varies for different agents.
使用关键的 3 期研究的数据评估了基线骨折风险评估工具 (FRAX®) 与治疗效果之间的关系。与安慰剂相比,巴多昔芬(BZA)的椎体、非椎体和所有临床骨折的相对风险随着骨折概率的增加而降低,但雷洛昔芬(RLX)的相对风险基本保持不变。
为了确定 FRAX® 是否能预测骨质疏松症治疗效果,我们根据 3 期骨质疏松症治疗研究中 FRAX®确定的基线骨折风险,评估了 BZA 和 RLX 降低骨折发生率的效果。
使用 Cox 回归模型计算 BZA 和 RLX 与安慰剂相比椎体、非椎体和所有临床骨折发生率的危害比(HR)。在 FRAX®确定的 10 年骨折概率阈值或以上的亚组中进行 Cox 回归分析。
BZA 椎体、非椎体和所有临床骨折的风险 HR 随着 10 年骨折概率的增加而降低,而 RLX 的 HR 保持稳定。在所有 10 年骨折概率亚组中,所有 BZA 剂量均显著降低了椎体骨折风险(HR=0.22-0.66)。BZA 20、40 和 20/40 mg 显著降低了非椎体骨折风险(HR=0.45、0.44 和 0.45)和所有临床骨折风险(HR=0.38、0.41 和 0.40)≥20.0%骨折概率。RLX 60 mg 与安慰剂相比,椎体骨折风险降低在较低骨折概率亚组(≥2.5-≥10.0%)中显著,但在较高骨折概率亚组(≥12.5%)中不显著,在非椎体或所有临床骨折亚组中均不显著。
BZA 的抗骨折疗效随基线 FRAX®评分的增加而增加,但 RLX 与基线 FRAX®之间无明显关系。这些发现为现有文献提供了独立的证实,表明 FRAX®与治疗效果之间的关系因不同药物而异。