Suppr超能文献

两种超声强化微萃取方法与 HPLC 结合测定水中杀螨剂的比较。

Comparison of two ultrasound-enhanced microextractions combined with HPLC for determining acaricides in water.

机构信息

Department of Applied Chemistry, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Sep Sci. 2013 Jul;36(13):2196-202. doi: 10.1002/jssc.201300283.

Abstract

An ultrasound-enhanced in situ solvent formation microextraction has been developed first time and compared with ultrasound-enhanced ionic-liquid-assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for the HPLC analysis of acaricides in environmental water samples. A ionic liquid ([C8MIM][PF6]) was used as the green extraction solvent through two pathways. The experimental parameters, such as the type and volume of both of the extraction solvent disperser solvent, ultrasonication time, and salt addition, were investigated and optimized. The analytical performance using the optimized conditions proved the feasibility of the developed methods for the quantitation of trace levels of acaricides by obtaining limits of detection that range from 0.54 to 3.68 μg/L. The in situ solvent formation microextraction method possesses more positive characteristics than the ionic-liquid-assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction method (except for spirodiclofen determination) when comparing the validation parameters. Both methods were successfully applied to determining acaricides in real water samples.

摘要

首次开发了超声增强原位溶剂形成微萃取,并将其与超声增强离子液体辅助分散液液微萃取进行了比较,用于环境水样中杀螨剂的 HPLC 分析。通过两种途径,将离子液体([C8MIM][PF6])用作绿色萃取溶剂。考察并优化了实验参数,如萃取溶剂分散剂溶剂的类型和体积、超声时间和加盐量。使用优化条件的分析性能证明了所开发方法通过获得从 0.54 到 3.68μg/L 的检测限来定量痕量杀螨剂的可行性。在比较验证参数时,与离子液体辅助分散液液微萃取方法(除螺螨酯测定外)相比,原位溶剂形成微萃取方法具有更多的积极特性。两种方法均成功应用于实际水样中杀螨剂的测定。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验