• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

希腊复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者治疗的经济学评价。

Economic evaluation of therapies for patients suffering from relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma in Greece.

机构信息

National School of Public Health, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Cancer Manag Res. 2013 Apr 10;5:37-48. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S43373. Print 2013.

DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S43373
PMID:23596356
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3627436/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple myeloma is a hematologic malignancy that incurs a substantial economic burden in care management. Since most patients with multiple myeloma eventually relapse or become refractory to current therapies (rrMM), the aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of the combination of lenalidomide-dexamethasone, relative to bortezomib alone, in patients suffering from rrMM in Greece.

METHODS

An international discrete event simulation model was locally adapted to estimate differences in overall survival and treatment costs associated with the two alternative treatment options. The efficacy data utilized came from three international trials (MM-009, MM-010, APEX). Quality of life data were extracted from the published literature. Data on resource use and prices came from relevant local sources and referred to 2012. The perspective of the analysis was that of public providers. Total costs for monitoring and administration of therapy to patients, management of adverse events, and cost of medication were captured. A 3.5% discount rate was used for costs and health outcomes. A Monte Carlo simulation was used to estimate probabilistic results with 95% uncertainty intervals (UI) and a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve.

RESULTS

The mean number of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was 3.01 (95% UI 2.81-3.20) and 2.22 (95% UI 2.02-2.41) for lenalidomide-dexamethasone and bortezomib, respectively, giving an incremental gain of 0.79 (95% UI 0.49-1.06) QALYs in favor of lenalidomide-dexamethasone. The mean cost of therapy per patient was estimated at €80;77,670 (95% UI €80;76,509-€80;78,900) and €80;48,928 (95% UI €80;48,300-€80;49,556) for lenalidomide-dexamethasone and bortezomib, respectively. The incremental cost per life year gained with lenalidomide-dexamethasone was estimated at €80;29,415 (95% UI €80;23,484-€80;37,583) and the incremental cost per QALY gained at €80;38,268 (95% UI €80;27,001-€80;58,065). The probability of lenalidomide-dexamethasone being a cost-effective therapy option at a threshold three times the per capita income (€80;60,000 per QALY) was higher than 95%. The results remained constant, without altering the conclusions, under several hypothetical scenarios.

CONCLUSION

The combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone may represent a cost-effective choice relative to bortezomib monotherapy for patients in Greece with previously treated multiple myeloma.

摘要

背景

多发性骨髓瘤是一种血液系统恶性肿瘤,在治疗管理方面会带来巨大的经济负担。由于大多数多发性骨髓瘤患者最终会复发或对当前的治疗方法产生耐药(rrMM),因此本研究旨在评估来那度胺-地塞米松联合治疗与硼替佐米单药治疗在希腊 rrMM 患者中的成本效益。

方法

对国际离散事件模拟模型进行了本地化调整,以评估两种替代治疗方案的总生存和治疗成本差异。使用的疗效数据来自三项国际试验(MM-009、MM-010、APEX)。从已发表的文献中提取生活质量数据。资源利用和价格数据来自相关的本地来源,并参考了 2012 年的数据。分析的角度是公共提供者。监测和管理患者治疗、不良事件管理以及药物治疗成本都被计入在内。采用 3.5%的贴现率来计算成本和健康结果。采用蒙特卡罗模拟来估计具有 95%不确定性区间(UI)和成本效益可接受性曲线的概率结果。

结果

来那度胺-地塞米松组的平均质量调整生命年(QALY)为 3.01(95%UI 2.81-3.20),硼替佐米组为 2.22(95%UI 2.02-2.41),来那度胺-地塞米松组比硼替佐米组有 0.79(95%UI 0.49-1.06)的 QALY 增量获益。每位患者的治疗平均成本估计为 8077670 欧元(95%UI 8076509-8078900 欧元)和 8048928 欧元(95%UI 8048300-8048956 欧元),分别用于来那度胺-地塞米松和硼替佐米。使用来那度胺-地塞米松的增量成本每获得一年生命的费用估计为 8029415 欧元(95%UI 8023484-8037583 欧元),每获得一个 QALY 的增量成本为 8038268 欧元(95%UI 8027001-8058065 欧元)。来那度胺-地塞米松作为一种成本效益治疗选择的概率高于 95%,在阈值为人均收入的三倍(每 QALY 806000 欧元)时,该疗法的成本效益更高。在几种假设情况下,结果仍然保持不变,没有改变结论。

结论

对于希腊既往治疗过的多发性骨髓瘤患者,来那度胺联合地塞米松治疗可能是一种比硼替佐米单药治疗更具成本效益的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b65f/3627436/cf46e675c292/cmar-5-037Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b65f/3627436/1a1e36a21569/cmar-5-037Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b65f/3627436/fcbdc1ee6220/cmar-5-037Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b65f/3627436/cf46e675c292/cmar-5-037Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b65f/3627436/1a1e36a21569/cmar-5-037Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b65f/3627436/fcbdc1ee6220/cmar-5-037Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b65f/3627436/cf46e675c292/cmar-5-037Fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Economic evaluation of therapies for patients suffering from relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma in Greece.希腊复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者治疗的经济学评价。
Cancer Manag Res. 2013 Apr 10;5:37-48. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S43373. Print 2013.
2
Cost utility and budget impact analysis of dexamethasone compared with bortezomib and lenalidomide for the treatment of second line multiple myeloma from a South African public health perspective.从南非公共卫生角度比较地塞米松与硼替佐米和来那度胺治疗二线多发性骨髓瘤的成本效用和预算影响分析
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022 Dec 12;20(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12962-022-00399-4.
3
Cost-effectiveness of novel relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma therapies in Norway: lenalidomide plus dexamethasone vs bortezomib.挪威新型复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤治疗方案的成本效益分析:来那度胺联合地塞米松对比硼替佐米。
J Med Econ. 2011;14(6):690-7. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.611841. Epub 2011 Sep 5.
4
Cost-effectiveness of lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone compared to bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone for the second-line treatment of multiple myeloma in Chile.在智利,来那度胺联合地塞米松与硼替佐米联合地塞米松用于多发性骨髓瘤二线治疗的成本效益比较
Medwave. 2018 Jun 29;18(3):e7220. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2018.03.7220.
5
Estimating the Economic Impact of Adding Panobinostat to a U.S. Formulary for Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Budget Impact and Cost-Benefit Model.评估泛昔洛韦加入美国复发性和/或难治性多发性骨髓瘤处方集的经济影响:预算影响和成本效益模型。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Aug;22(8):991-1002. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.8.991.
6
Cost-effectiveness of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone vs. bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone in transplant-ineligible U.S. patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma.来那度胺联合地塞米松与硼替佐米联合美法仑及泼尼松治疗美国新诊断的不适于移植的多发性骨髓瘤患者的成本效益分析
J Med Econ. 2016;19(3):243-58. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1115407. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
7
Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone for Treating Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated with Lenalidomide and Bortezomib: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of an NICE Single Technology Appraisal.来那度胺和硼替佐米治疗后复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤的泊马度胺联合地塞米松治疗:一项 NICE 单技术评估的循证审查组观点。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Feb;36(2):145-159. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0581-6.
8
Cost Effectiveness of Triplet Selinexor-Bortezomib-Dexamethasone (XVd) in Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma (MM) Based on Results from the Phase III BOSTON Trial.基于 III 期 BOSTON 试验结果,三药联合塞利昔布-硼替佐米-地塞米松(XVd)在既往治疗多发性骨髓瘤(MM)中的成本效益。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Nov;39(11):1309-1325. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01068-9. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
9
Estimating the Costs of Therapy in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Model Framework.评估复发和/或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的治疗成本:一个模型框架。
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2015 Jun;8(4):204-15.
10
Cost-effectiveness of Daratumumab-based Triplet Therapies in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.达雷妥尤单抗为基础的三联疗法治疗复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的成本效益分析。
Clin Ther. 2018 Jul;40(7):1122-1139. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost utility and budget impact analysis of dexamethasone compared with bortezomib and lenalidomide for the treatment of second line multiple myeloma from a South African public health perspective.从南非公共卫生角度比较地塞米松与硼替佐米和来那度胺治疗二线多发性骨髓瘤的成本效用和预算影响分析
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022 Dec 12;20(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12962-022-00399-4.
2
Cost Effectiveness of Triplet Selinexor-Bortezomib-Dexamethasone (XVd) in Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma (MM) Based on Results from the Phase III BOSTON Trial.基于 III 期 BOSTON 试验结果,三药联合塞利昔布-硼替佐米-地塞米松(XVd)在既往治疗多发性骨髓瘤(MM)中的成本效益。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Nov;39(11):1309-1325. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01068-9. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Lenalidomide-Plus-Dexamethasone in Multiple Myeloma Patients Who Have Received at Least One Prior Therapy: A South Korean Perspective.
Value Health. 2014 Nov;17(7):A736. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.111. Epub 2014 Oct 26.
2
The role of novel agents on the reversibility of renal impairment in newly diagnosed symptomatic patients with multiple myeloma.新型药物在新诊断为多发性骨髓瘤的有症状患者肾功能损害可逆性中的作用。
Leukemia. 2013 Feb;27(2):423-9. doi: 10.1038/leu.2012.182. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
3
Novel anticancer agents for multiple myeloma: a review of the evidence for their therapeutic and economic value.新型多发性骨髓瘤抗肿瘤药物:对其治疗价值和经济价值证据的综述。
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: First-Line Avelumab Plus Axitinib Versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.一项成本效益分析:一线阿维鲁单抗联合阿昔替尼与舒尼替尼治疗晚期肾细胞癌的对比
Front Pharmacol. 2020 May 8;11:619. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00619. eCollection 2020.
4
Cost Effectiveness of Transplant, Conventional Chemotherapy, and Novel Agents in Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review.移植、常规化疗和新型药物治疗多发性骨髓瘤的成本效益:系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Dec;37(12):1421-1449. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00828-y.
5
Cost-effectiveness of bortezomib for multiple myeloma: a systematic review.硼替佐米治疗多发性骨髓瘤的成本效益:一项系统评价
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 May 3;8:137-51. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S104195. eCollection 2016.
6
Clinical utility and patient consideration in the use of lenalidomide for multiple myeloma in Chinese patients.来那度胺在中国患者中用于治疗多发性骨髓瘤的临床效用及患者考量
Onco Targets Ther. 2015 Jun 2;8:1277-84. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S65762. eCollection 2015.
7
When to use discrete event simulation (DES) for the economic evaluation of health technologies? A review and critique of the costs and benefits of DES.何时使用离散事件模拟(DES)进行卫生技术的经济评估?对DES成本与效益的综述与批判。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Jun;32(6):547-58. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0147-9.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2012 Jun;12(6):839-54. doi: 10.1586/era.12.42.
4
Economic evaluation of intravenous iron treatments in the management of anemia patients in Greece.希腊贫血患者管理中静脉铁剂治疗的经济学评估。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;4:127-34. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S30514. Epub 2012 May 4.
5
Lenalidomide for multiple myeloma: cost-effectiveness in patients with one prior therapy in England and Wales.来那度胺治疗多发性骨髓瘤:在英格兰和威尔士有一次既往治疗的患者中的成本效益。
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Jun;14(3):507-14. doi: 10.1007/s10198-012-0395-6. Epub 2012 May 10.
6
Safety and efficacy of lenalidomide in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.来那度胺治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤的安全性和疗效。
Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2012;6:1-10. doi: 10.4137/CMO.S7275. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
7
Disparities in the prevalence, pathogenesis and progression of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma between blacks and whites.黑人与白人之间意义未明的单克隆丙种球蛋白病和多发性骨髓瘤的流行率、发病机制和进展的差异。
Leukemia. 2012 Apr;26(4):609-14. doi: 10.1038/leu.2011.368. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
8
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bortezomib and thalidomide in combination regimens with an alkylating agent and a corticosteroid for the first-line treatment of multiple myeloma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.硼替佐米联合来那度胺与烷化剂和皮质类固醇在多发性骨髓瘤一线治疗中的临床疗效和成本效益:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Dec;15(41):1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta15410.
9
Biosimilar medicines and cost-effectiveness.生物类似药与成本效益。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;3:29-36. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S12494. Epub 2011 Feb 10.
10
Cost-effectiveness of novel relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma therapies in Norway: lenalidomide plus dexamethasone vs bortezomib.挪威新型复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤治疗方案的成本效益分析:来那度胺联合地塞米松对比硼替佐米。
J Med Econ. 2011;14(6):690-7. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.611841. Epub 2011 Sep 5.