Kodjebacheva Gergana, Maliski Sally, Yu Fei, Oelrich Faye, Coleman Anne L
1Department of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Michigan-Flint, MI, USA.
J Sch Nurs. 2014 Feb;30(1):24-30. doi: 10.1177/1059840513486009. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
The study assessed the effectiveness of a pilot intervention to promote the use of eyeglasses in one school in California. The intervention used a one-group pretest, posttest design. Between January and June 2011, during the intervention, all first- and second-grade children received eye evaluations and the children with refractive error received two pairs of attractive eyeglasses. Parents received eye care education. Teachers monitored the use of eyeglasses in the classroom. Prior to the intervention in January 2011, 1 of the 15 children with refractive error (6.7%) wore eyeglasses in the classroom and the remaining 14 (93.3%) lacked eyeglasses altogether; 6 months following the end of the intervention in December 2011, 11 of the 15 children (73.3%) wore eyeglasses in the classroom and the remaining 4 (26.7%) did not (p = .002). The multifactorial intervention increased the use of eyeglasses in the classroom even months after the end of the summer vacation.
该研究评估了一项试点干预措施在加利福尼亚州一所学校促进眼镜使用的有效性。该干预采用单组前测、后测设计。在2011年1月至6月的干预期间,所有一、二年级儿童接受了眼部评估,有屈光不正的儿童获得了两副吸引人的眼镜。家长接受了眼部护理教育。教师在课堂上监测眼镜的使用情况。在2011年1月干预之前,15名有屈光不正的儿童中有1名(6.7%)在课堂上戴眼镜,其余14名(93.3%)完全没有眼镜;在2011年12月干预结束6个月后,15名儿童中有11名(73.3%)在课堂上戴眼镜,其余4名(26.7%)没有戴(p = 0.002)。即使在暑假结束数月后,多因素干预仍增加了课堂上眼镜的使用。