3T 颅内动脉瘤 3D 电影相位对比 MRI 与个体化计算流体动力学比较。

3D cine phase-contrast MRI at 3T in intracranial aneurysms compared with patient-specific computational fluid dynamics.

机构信息

Departments of Radiology.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Sep;34(9):1785-91. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3484. Epub 2013 Apr 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

CFD has been proved valuable for simulating blood flow in intracranial aneurysms, which may add to better rupture risk assessment. However, CFD has drawbacks such as the sensitivity to assumptions needed for the model, which may hinder its clinical implementation. 3D PC-MR imaging is a technique that enables measurements of blood flow. The purpose of this study was to compare flow patterns on the basis of 3D PC-MR imaging with CFD estimates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

3D PC-MR imaging was performed in 8 intracranial aneurysms. Two sets of patient-specific inflow boundaries for CFD were obtained from a separate 2D PC-MR imaging sequence (2D CFD) and from the 3D PC-MR imaging (3D CFD) data. 3D PC-MR imaging and CFD were compared by calculation of the differences between velocity vector magnitudes and angles. Differences in flow patterns expressed as the presence and strengths of vortices were determined by calculation of singular flow energy.

RESULTS

In systole, flow features such as vortex patterns were similar. In diastole, 3D PC-MR imaging measurements appeared inconsistent due to low velocity-to-noise ratios. The relative difference in velocity magnitude was 67.6 ± 51.4% and 27.1 ± 24.9% in systole and 33.7 ± 21.5% and 17.7 ± 10.2% in diastole for 2D CFD and 3D CFD, respectively. For singular energy, this was reduced to 15.5 ± 13.9% at systole and 19.4 ± 17.6% at diastole (2D CFD).

CONCLUSIONS

In systole, good agreement between 3D PC-MR imaging and CFD on flow-pattern visualization and singular-energy calculation was found. In diastole, flow patterns of 3D PC-MR imaging differed from those obtained from CFD due to low velocity-to-noise ratios.

摘要

背景与目的

CFD 已被证明可用于模拟颅内动脉瘤中的血流,这可能有助于更好地评估破裂风险。然而,CFD 存在一些缺点,例如模型所需假设的敏感性,这可能会阻碍其临床应用。3D PC-MR 成像技术可用于测量血流。本研究旨在比较基于 3D PC-MR 成像和 CFD 估计的血流模式。

材料与方法

对 8 例颅内动脉瘤进行 3D PC-MR 成像。通过从单独的 2D PC-MR 成像序列(2D CFD)和 3D PC-MR 成像(3D CFD)数据中获取两组患者特定的流入边界,来获得 CFD 的两套数据。通过计算速度矢量大小和角度之间的差异来比较 3D PC-MR 成像和 CFD。通过计算奇异流能量来确定涡旋的存在和强度来确定流型差异。

结果

在收缩期,血流特征(如涡旋模式)相似。在舒张期,由于流速与噪声比低,3D PC-MR 成像测量结果不一致。在收缩期和舒张期,2D CFD 和 3D CFD 的速度幅度的相对差异分别为 67.6±51.4%和 27.1±24.9%,33.7±21.5%和 17.7±10.2%。对于奇异能量,这在收缩期降低至 15.5±13.9%,在舒张期降低至 19.4±17.6%(2D CFD)。

结论

在收缩期,发现 3D PC-MR 成像与 CFD 在流型可视化和奇异能量计算方面具有良好的一致性。在舒张期,由于流速与噪声比低,3D PC-MR 成像的血流模式与 CFD 获得的血流模式不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索