Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, The Alfred Hospital, Victoria, Australia.
Shock. 2013 Jun;39(6):488-94. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3182939831.
With animal models, death as an intentional end point is ethically unacceptable. However, in the study of septic shock, death is still considered the only relevant end point. We defined eight humane end points into four stages of severity (from healthy to moribund) and used to design a clinically relevant scoring tool, termed "the mouse clinical assessment score for sepsis" (M-CASS). The M-CASS was used to enable a consistent approach to the assessment of disease severity. This allowed an ethical and objective assessment of disease after which euthanasia was performed, instead of worsening suffering. The M-CASS displayed a high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.97) with a high level of agreement and an intraclass correlation coefficient equal to 0.91. The plasma levels of cytokines and markers of oxidative stress were all associated with the M-CASS score (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < 0.05). The M-CASS allows tracking of disease progression and animal welfare requirements.
在动物模型中,将死亡作为一个有意的终点在伦理上是不可接受的。然而,在脓毒性休克的研究中,死亡仍然被认为是唯一相关的终点。我们定义了八个人道终点,将其分为四个严重程度阶段(从健康到濒死),并用于设计一个临床相关的评分工具,称为“脓毒症小鼠临床评估评分”(M-CASS)。M-CASS 用于实现疾病严重程度评估的一致方法。这允许在进行安乐死而不是加重痛苦之前,对疾病进行伦理和客观评估。M-CASS 显示出高度的内部一致性(Cronbach α = 0.97),具有高度的一致性和等于 0.91 的组内相关系数。细胞因子和氧化应激标志物的血浆水平均与 M-CASS 评分相关(Kruskal-Wallis 检验,P < 0.05)。M-CASS 允许跟踪疾病进展和动物福利要求。