van den Brink Daan P, Kleinveld Derek J B, Polet Chantal A, Veltman Hendrik, Roelofs Joris J T H, Weber Nina C, Juffermans Nicole P
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 25;20(2):e0319272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319272. eCollection 2025.
The dysregulated immune response during sepsis involves endothelial injury, which may be augmented by infusion of clear fluids such as crystalloids. Plasma has been suggested as an alternative resuscitation fluid but it is unclear whether previously observed benefits were due to the type of fluid, or due to less volume required to restore tissue perfusion. We hypothesized that resuscitation with plasma reduces endothelial injury, inflammation, and organ injury compared to similar and higher volumes of crystalloids in a rat pneumosepsis model.
Rats were intratracheally inoculated with Streptococcus Pneumoniae to induce pneumosepsis. Twenty-four hours after inoculation, animals were randomized to 4 groups: healthy controls (non-resuscitated, n = 6), 10 ml/kg/hr (standard-volume, n = 11) crystalloid resuscitation, 3.33 ml/kg/hr (low-volume, n = 11) crystalloid resuscitation or 3.33 ml/kg/hr plasma resuscitation (n = 11). Plasma markers of inflammation and endothelial injury were measured. Organs were harvested for histology and wet-to-dry weight ratio determination.
Inoculated animals developed pneumosepsis, with lower mean arterial pressures (p < 0.001) and higher lactate levels (p < 0.001) compared to healthy controls. Animals resuscitated with plasma showed a trend towards lower syndecan-1 levels compared to the standard-volume crystalloid group (82 vs 99 ng/mL, p = 0.06) and had lower levels of VCAM-1 (424 vs 592 ng/mL, p < 0.01) compared to the standard volume crystalloid group, but not when compared to the low-volume crystalloid group. Other markers of endothelial injury or inflammation were not significantly different between groups. No significant differences were observed in histologic injury scores and wet-to-dry ratios.
Plasma resuscitation modestly reduces endothelial injury compared to crystalloid resuscitation. This effect might be attributed to decreased resuscitation volumes rather than the type of fluid.
脓毒症期间免疫反应失调涉及内皮损伤,输注晶体液等清亮液体可能会加重这种损伤。血浆已被提议作为一种替代复苏液体,但尚不清楚先前观察到的益处是由于液体类型,还是由于恢复组织灌注所需的液体量较少。我们假设,在大鼠肺炎脓毒症模型中,与相似体积和更高体积的晶体液相比,血浆复苏可减少内皮损伤、炎症和器官损伤。
通过气管内接种肺炎链球菌诱导大鼠发生肺炎脓毒症。接种24小时后,将动物随机分为4组:健康对照组(未复苏,n = 6)、10 ml/kg/hr(标准体积,n = 11)晶体液复苏组、3.33 ml/kg/hr(低体积,n = 11)晶体液复苏组或3.33 ml/kg/hr血浆复苏组(n = 11)。检测炎症和内皮损伤的血浆标志物。采集器官进行组织学检查和湿重与干重比值测定。
与健康对照组相比,接种动物发生肺炎脓毒症,平均动脉压较低(p < 0.001),乳酸水平较高(p < 0.001)。与标准体积晶体液组相比,血浆复苏的动物 syndecan-1 水平有降低趋势(82 对 99 ng/mL,p = 0.06),与标准体积晶体液组相比,VCAM-1 水平较低(424 对 592 ng/mL,p < 0.01),但与低体积晶体液组相比无差异。其他内皮损伤或炎症标志物在各组之间无显著差异。组织学损伤评分和湿重与干重比值未见显著差异。
与晶体液复苏相比,血浆复苏可适度减少内皮损伤。这种效应可能归因于复苏液体量的减少而非液体类型。