Edendale Hospital, University of KwaZulu Natal, Private Bag X9001, Pietermaritzburg 3200, South Africa.
World J Surg. 2013 Jul;37(7):1652-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2026-5.
The use of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is well established in trauma practice. This modality is readily available to centers with well-equipped operating facilities but may be challenging to introduce into resource-constrained institutions such as many South African township hospitals. We implemented VATS for retained post-traumatic pleural collections in our institution in 2007, and we have now performed an audit of the first 3 years of our experience.
A retrospective chart review was conducted of all patients who had undergone VATS from June 2007 to May 2010, and statistical analysis was performed to elucidate the findings.
Forty-three patients were examined, 40 of whom (93 %) were male. The mean age was 32 years (range: 15-52 years). Thirty-five patients (81 %) had stab injuries, 6 (14 %) had blunt injuries, and 2 (4 %) had gunshot wounds. Mean time from injury to VATS was 12.4 days (range: 3-31 days). Thirteen patients (30 %) had empyema at the time of VATS. The mean time from VATS to discharge was 9 days (range: 3-30 days). The postoperative complication rate was 14 % and included pneumonia (n = 3) and re-collections (n = 3, two of which were managed by reinsertion of a chest drain, and one cleared without further intervention). Further analysis revealed a longer postoperative length of stay when empyema was present at VATS (8 days for no empyema vs. 11 days when empyema was present; p = 0.027). The incidence of empyema increased progressively the longer the delay between injury and VATS (0 % for VATS performed in week 1, 32 % for VATS in week 2, 50 % for VATS in week 3, and 60 % for VATS beyond week 3; p = 0.019). The incidence of empyema increased when >1 chest drain was inserted prior to VATS (15 % for 0-1 chest drain vs. 43 % for >1 chest drain; p = 0.043).
Introducing VATS for retained post-traumatic collections into a relatively resource-constrained township hospital in South Africa is safe and effective. Consideration should be given to performing VATS early and avoiding the use of a second and third chest drain for retained collections. This approach may lead to decreased incidence of empyema and shorter overall hospital stay.
在创伤实践中,电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)的应用已得到充分证实。这种方法在设备齐全的手术中心很容易实施,但在资源有限的机构(如南非许多乡镇医院)引入可能具有挑战性。我们于 2007 年在我们的机构中实施了 VATS 治疗创伤后遗留的胸腔积液,现在对我们的前 3 年经验进行了审核。
对 2007 年 6 月至 2010 年 5 月期间接受 VATS 的所有患者进行回顾性图表审查,并进行统计分析以阐明发现。
共检查了 43 例患者,其中 40 例(93%)为男性。平均年龄为 32 岁(范围:15-52 岁)。35 例(81%)为刺伤,6 例(14%)为钝伤,2 例(4%)为枪伤。从受伤到 VATS 的平均时间为 12.4 天(范围:3-31 天)。13 例(30%)在 VATS 时患有脓胸。从 VATS 到出院的平均时间为 9 天(范围:3-30 天)。术后并发症发生率为 14%,包括肺炎(n=3)和再收集(n=3,其中 2 例通过重新插入胸腔引流管进行管理,1 例无需进一步干预即可清除)。进一步分析显示,当 VATS 时存在脓胸时,术后住院时间较长(无脓胸时为 8 天,存在脓胸时为 11 天;p=0.027)。VATS 进行的时间越长,脓胸的发生率就越高(第 1 周为 0%,第 2 周为 32%,第 3 周为 50%,第 3 周后为 60%;p=0.019)。在 VATS 之前插入>1 根胸腔引流管时,脓胸的发生率增加(0-1 根胸腔引流管为 15%,>1 根胸腔引流管为 43%;p=0.043)。
在南非一个相对资源有限的乡镇医院中引入 VATS 治疗创伤后遗留的胸腔积液是安全有效的。应考虑尽早进行 VATS,并避免在遗留胸腔积液时使用第二根和第三根胸腔引流管。这种方法可能会降低脓胸的发生率并缩短总住院时间。