Video-assisted thoracic surgery in the treatment of posttraumatic empyema.

BACKGROUND

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) appears to be replacing open thoracotomy for the treatment of posttraumatic thoracic complications.

OBJECTIVE

To compare operative times, complication rates, and outcomes in patients who underwent VATS vs open thoracotomy.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

University hospital, level I trauma center.

PATIENTS

Trauma patients who between December 1993 and May 1997 underwent open thoracotomy or VATS to drain a persistent thoracic collection.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed for demographic data, operative times, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 524 trauma patients requiring tube thoracostomy, 22 underwent 23 procedures to drain empyema (17 VATS, 6 thoracotomies [based on surgeon preferencel). There were no differences in age, Injury Severity Score, or mechanism of injury between the 2 groups. Three patients who underwent VATS (18%) required conversion to open thoracotomy for adequate drainage. All remaining patients who underwent VATS had successful treatment of their empyema. Complication rates (VATS=29%, open thoracotomy=33%; P=.99), operative times (VATS=3.4+/-1.3 hours [mean+/-SD], open thoracotomy=3.0+/-1.5 hours; P=.46), postoperative epidural catheter use (VATS=31%, open thoracotomy=50%; P=.63), duration of chest tube drainage (VATS=5.1+/-1.7 days [mean+/-SD], open thoracotomy=4.5+/-1.5 days; P=.48), and hospital stay after the procedure (VATS=16+/-14 days [mean+/-SD], open thoracotomy=11+/-5 days; P=.39) were similar for both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Video-assisted thoracic surgery was a safe and effective operative strategy for the treatment of posttraumatic empyema. Therefore, because VATS has been shown in nontrauma patients to reduce morbidity and because it provides better cosmesis, we believe that it should be the initial operative approach to trauma patients with suspected posttraumatic empyema.