Suppr超能文献

手臂压迫试验:一种用于区分颈源性和肩痛的新的临床检查方法。

Arm Squeeze Test: a new clinical test to distinguish neck from shoulder pain.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2013 Jul;22(7):1558-63. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2788-3. Epub 2013 Apr 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Objective of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic values of the Arm Squeeze Test. The test consists in squeezing the middle third of the upper arm.

METHODS

1,567 patients were included in this study. Diagnosis of cervical nerve root compression or shoulder disease was clinically formulated and confirmed with imaging before performing test. 350 healthy volunteers were recruited as controls. The test was positive when score on a VAS Scale was 3 points or higher on squeezing the middle third of the upper arm compared to acromioclavicular (AC) joint and anterolateral-subacromial area.

RESULTS

Patients were subdivided as follows: 903 with rotator cuff tear, 155 with shoulder adhesive capsulitis, 101 with AC joint arthropathy, 55 with calcifying tendonitis, and 48 affected by glenohumeral arthritis. The study sample included 305 patients with cervical nerve root compression from C5 to T1 with shoulder radicular pain. The test was positive in 295/305 (96.7%) of patients with cervical nerve root compression, compared to 35/903 (3.87%), 3/155 (1.93%), 0/101 (0%), 1/55 (1.81%) and 4/48 (8.33%) of those with rotator cuff tear, adhesive capsulitis, AC arthropathy, calcifying tendonitis and glenohumeral arthritis, respectively. A positive result was obtained in 14/350 asymptomatic subjects (4%). If patients with cervical nerve root compression were compared to controls and patients with shoulder diseases, the test had sensitivity of 0.96 and specificity from 0.91 to 1.

CONCLUSIONS

The Arm Squeeze Test may be useful to distinguish cervical nerve root compression from shoulder disease in case of doubtful diagnosis. A positive result to this test may lead to cervical etiology of the shoulder pain.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估上肢挤压试验的诊断价值。该试验包括挤压上臂中段。

方法

本研究纳入了 1567 名患者。在进行试验之前,根据临床制定的颈椎神经根压迫或肩部疾病的诊断,并结合影像学进行了确认。招募了 350 名健康志愿者作为对照组。与肩锁关节(AC)和前肩峰下区域相比,当挤压上臂中段时,VAS 评分达到 3 分或更高时,试验结果为阳性。

结果

患者分为以下几类:903 例肩袖撕裂,155 例粘连性肩关节囊炎,101 例 AC 关节病,55 例钙化性肌腱炎,48 例肩关节炎。本研究样本包括 305 例颈神经根受压患者(C5 至 T1),肩部神经根痛。上肢挤压试验在 305 例颈椎神经根受压患者中阳性率为 295/305(96.7%),而在肩袖撕裂、粘连性肩关节囊炎、AC 关节病、钙化性肌腱炎和肩关节炎患者中阳性率分别为 3/903(3.87%)、3/155(1.93%)、0/101(0%)、1/55(1.81%)和 4/48(8.33%)。在 350 名无症状受试者中,上肢挤压试验阳性 14 例(4%)。如果将颈椎神经根受压患者与对照组和肩部疾病患者进行比较,该试验的敏感性为 0.96,特异性为 0.91 至 1。

结论

上肢挤压试验有助于在诊断不确定的情况下区分颈椎神经根压迫和肩部疾病。上肢挤压试验阳性可能提示肩部疼痛的颈椎病因。

相似文献

1
Arm Squeeze Test: a new clinical test to distinguish neck from shoulder pain.
Eur Spine J. 2013 Jul;22(7):1558-63. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2788-3. Epub 2013 Apr 21.
2
Coracoid pain test: a new clinical sign of shoulder adhesive capsulitis.
Int Orthop. 2010 Mar;34(3):385-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0791-4. Epub 2009 May 6.
4
Investigation of C-C radiculopathy and shoulder rotator cuff lesions coexistence frequency.
North Clin Istanb. 2018 Nov 16;6(3):260-266. doi: 10.14744/nci.2018.04796. eCollection 2019.
5
Shoulder manipulation under targeted ultrasound-guided rotator interval block for adhesive capsulitis.
Skeletal Radiol. 2019 Aug;48(8):1269-1274. doi: 10.1007/s00256-018-3105-3. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
7
Chronic shoulder pain: part I. Evaluation and diagnosis.
Am Fam Physician. 2008 Feb 15;77(4):453-60.
9
Cervical roots as origin of pain in the neck or scapular regions.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Aug 1;31(17):E568-73. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000229261.02816.48.
10

引用本文的文献

1
The resisted levator scapulae test: a clinical test for C4 radiculopathy.
Eur Spine J. 2025 May 27. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08903-z.
2
Association between Shoulder Dysfunction and Concomitant Neck Disability in Patients with Shoulder Disorders.
Prog Rehabil Med. 2024 Oct 8;9:20240034. doi: 10.2490/prm.20240034. eCollection 2024.
3
Untwining the intertwined: a comprehensive review on differentiating pathologies of the shoulder and spine.
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2024 Mar 19;4(3):385-392. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.02.007. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
The diagnostic value of physical examination tests in adhesive capsulitis: a systematic review.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Dec;59(6):724-730. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07940-6. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
8
Overlapping, Masquerading, and Causative Cervical Spine and Shoulder Pathology: A Systematic Review.
Global Spine J. 2020 Apr;10(2):195-208. doi: 10.1177/2192568218822536. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
10
Diagnostic Accuracy of Chinese Medicine Diagnosis Scale of Phlegm and Blood Stasis Syndrome in Coronary Heart Disease: A Study Protocol.
Chin J Integr Med. 2019 Jul;25(7):515-520. doi: 10.1007/s11655-018-2793-9. Epub 2018 May 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening for head, neck, and shoulder pathology in patients with upper extremity signs and symptoms.
J Hand Ther. 2010 Apr-Jun;23(2):173-85; quiz 186. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2009.11.004. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
2
The relationship between chronic type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation and cervical spine pain.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Dec 16;10:157. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-157.
5
A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy.
Eur Spine J. 2007 Mar;16(3):307-19. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0225-6. Epub 2006 Sep 30.
6
7
Shoulder impingement presenting as neck pain.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Apr;85(4):635-8. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200304000-00008.
8
Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination and patient self-report measures for cervical radiculopathy.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jan 1;28(1):52-62. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00014.
9
The architecture of diagnostic research.
BMJ. 2002 Mar 2;324(7336):539-41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7336.539.
10
The Spurling test and cervical radiculopathy.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jan 15;27(2):156-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200201150-00007.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验