McKinley Danette W, Hess Brian J, Boulet John R, Lipner Rebecca S
Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research (FAIMER®), 3624 Market Street, 4th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA,
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2014 Mar;19(1):19-28. doi: 10.1007/s10459-013-9456-6. Epub 2013 Apr 20.
Changes in certification requirements and examinee characteristics are likely to influence the validity of the evidence associated with interpretations made based on test data. We examined whether changes in Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG) certification requirements over time were associated with changes in internal medicine (IM) residency program director ratings and certification examination scores. Comparisons were made between physicians who were ECFMG-certified before and after the Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA) requirement. A multivariate analysis of covariance was conducted to examine the differences in program director ratings based on CSA cohort and whether the examinees emigrated for undergraduate medical education (national vs. international students). A univariate analysis of covariance was conducted to examine differences in scores from the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Internal Medicine Certification Examination. For both analyses, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 and Step 2 scores were used as covariates. Results indicate that, of those certified by ECFMG between 1993 and 1997, 17 % (n = 1,775) left their country of citizenship for undergraduate medical education. In contrast, 38 % (n = 1,874) of those certified between 1999 and 2003 were international students. After adjustment by covariates, the main effect of cohort membership on the program director ratings was statistically significant (Wilks' λ = 0.99, F 5, 15391 = 19.9, P < 0.001). However, the strength of the relationship between cohort group and the ratings was weak (η = 0.01). The main effect of migration status was statistically significant and weak (Wilks' λ = 0.98, F 5,15391 = 45.3, P < 0.01; η = 0.02). Differences in ABIM Internal Medicine Certification Examination scores based on whether or not CSA were required was statistically significant, although the magnitude of the association between these variables was very small. The findings suggest that the implementation of an additional evaluation of skills (e.g., history-taking, physical examination) as a prerequisite to postgraduate medical education (residency) provides some additional, relevant data to those who select ECFMG-certified residents.
认证要求和考生特征的变化可能会影响基于考试数据所做解读相关证据的有效性。我们研究了外国医学毕业生教育委员会(ECFMG)认证要求随时间的变化是否与内科(IM)住院医师培训项目主任评分及认证考试成绩的变化相关。对在临床技能评估(CSA)要求实施之前和之后获得ECFMG认证的医师进行了比较。进行了多变量协方差分析,以检验基于CSA队列以及考生是否因本科医学教育而移民(本国学生与国际学生)的项目主任评分差异。进行了单变量协方差分析,以检验美国内科医学委员会(ABIM)内科认证考试成绩的差异。对于这两项分析,美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第一步和第二步成绩均用作协变量。结果表明,在1993年至1997年间获得ECFMG认证的人中,17%(n = 1775)为本科医学教育而离开其公民所在国。相比之下,在1999年至2003年间获得认证的人中有38%(n = 1874)是国际学生。经协变量调整后,队列成员对项目主任评分的主效应具有统计学意义(威尔克斯λ = 0.99,F5, 15391 = 19.9,P < 0.001)。然而,队列组与评分之间关系的强度较弱(η = 0.01)。移民状态的主效应具有统计学意义且较弱(威尔克斯λ = 0.98,F5,15391 = 45.3,P < 0.01;η = 0.02)。基于是否需要CSA的ABIM内科认证考试成绩差异具有统计学意义,尽管这些变量之间关联的幅度非常小。研究结果表明,将技能的额外评估(例如病史采集、体格检查)作为研究生医学教育(住院医师培训)的先决条件,为那些选拔获得ECFMG认证的住院医师的人提供了一些额外的相关数据。